CRNA Court Victory is a Win for Rural Hospitals
As for the California ruling, it's hard to see how this could end up differently. Many rural hospitals are running on razor thin margins. Medicare and Medicaid are trimming reimbursements, and private plans have adopted zero tolerance toward cost shifting. The hunt for savings is prompting hospital administrations to reexamine every aspect of care delivery, as they should.
Again, if there is no conclusive evidence to show that patients receive substandard care or are placed at greater risk under CRNAs, rural hospitals that provide bread-and-butter surgical procedures should not have to pay considerably more for the services of an anesthesiologist.
Anesthesiologists commanded top compensation during a robust economy. Like many other professionals, however, they may have to readjust their expectations. Perhaps it is time for them to make compensation demands that are more compatible with the market.
- CA Court Rejects Nurse Anesthetists Supervision Petition
- Nurse Anesthetists Battle Overlooks Rural Doctor Shortage
- Nurse Anesthetists Say They Practice Safely Without Physician Supervision
- Doctors Sue To Stop Nurse Anesthetists From Administering Anesthesia
John Commins is a senior editor with HealthLeaders Media.
- Federal Appeals Court Mulls Observation Status
- How the Military's EHR Reboot Will Impact Interoperability
- HCA to Acquire CareNow Urgent Care Centers
- How One Health System Saved $3.5M in Benefits Costs
- BCBS Tries New Drug Contracting Model
- Abington Health, Jefferson Health Plan '100% Equal' Merger
- Dental Board Case Before SCOTUS Has Far-Reaching Implications
- The Case for Recycling Surgical Supplies
- 'Leadership Gap' Threatens MU Momentum, Says AMA
- Ballot Initiative Pits Providers Against Payers in SD