HCA Probe Reignites Questions Over Interventional Appropriateness
A third development may have had some influence as well. Last July, a report in the Journal of the American Medical Association used the American College of Cardiology's PCI registry and found that only 50% of a sample of such procedures met necessity criteria, 12% were indisputably unnecessary, and another 38% were uncertain.
Fonarow says that over the last several years, perhaps in response to "some of the earlier cases that were under scrutiny," hospitals, cardiology practices and professional societies have become proactive to assure the necessity of all procedures.
Sometimes, he says, hospitals will have a second interventional cardiologist review the films before allowing an interventionalist to proceed. Or, cases will be subject to subsequent peer review.
Some hospitals have decided to regularly select a random set of cases to send to a committee "to see if there's any concern and provide feedback, to make sure they're providing high quality, but also appropriate, care."
"You're seeing lot of hospitals doing that," he says.
- Why Is Healthcare Price Transparency So Hard?
- 5 Hot Healthcare Ideas from SXSW
- EHR Spending Continues, But Jury Still Out on ROI
- Care Coordination a Cost-Cutting Quality Driver
- Adverse Events from Insulin Prescribing 'An Epidemic'
- Hospital Groups Strike Back at Hospital Rating Systems
- The Trouble with Hospital Price Transparency
- Hospital CEO Turnover Hits Record High
- 4 Marketing Tactics for Hospitals on Instagram
- Payers Detail Strategies That Drive Consumer Satisfaction