OIG Recommendation 'Would Kill Rural Health'
"These hospitals are costly for Medicare and beneficiaries, but we have to balance cost concerns with hospital access for rural beneficiaries," Jordan said on the podcast. "With that balance in mind, we recommend that CMS create alternative location related requirements for critical access hospitals that don't meet the distance or rural requirements. For example, CMS could allow critical access hospitals to keep their designations—if they serve communities with high poverty rates."
Morgan says the nation's hospitals are already reeling from the effects of the 2% sequestration cuts and that removing the critical access designation, which theoretically allows hospitals to collect 101% of Medicare costs, "effectively closes them."
"The first thing we are going to hear argued back at us is that OIG isn't recommending that they shut the doors, but they are," Morgan says. "When they're talking about removing that designation from facilities where a large percentage of them are operating in the red already, that will effectively close them. So it's not an honest argument saying that 'we are not recommending closing 800 rural hospitals.'"
John Commins is a senior editor with HealthLeaders Media.
- 12 Hires to Keep Your Hospital Out of Trouble
- Meaningful Use Payment Adjustments Begin
- 'Mega Boards' Could be Rural Healthcare Disruptor
- Ratcheting Up Patient Experience Has a Downside
- HL20: Lee Aase—Who's Behind @MayoClinic
- 1 in 5 Eligible Hospitals Penalized for HACs
- HL20: Sam Foote, MD—The Courage to Speak Up
- HL20: Derek Angus, MD—An Intense Focus on Care
- Taming Time and Moving Healthcare Data
- HL20: Anne Wojcicki—Unlocking Consumer Access to Genetics