Community Hospitals
e-Newsletter
Intelligence Unit Special Reports Special Events Subscribe Sponsored Departments Follow Us

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn RSS

SCOTUS Review of NC Board Case 'A Very Big Deal' to Providers

John Commins, for HealthLeaders Media, March 5, 2014

Levine says the issues driving the two suits are different, but related, and that could bode well for the FTC.

"The question in Phoebe Putney was 'was the enabling legislation that created the hospital authority sufficiently explicit in that it allowed the hospital authority to essentially authorize anticompetitive acquisitions?'" Levine says.

"The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals had said that the legislation authorizing the hospital authority essentially was broad enough to contemplate the anticompetitive consequences of it acting on its authority. The Supreme Court basically said that is too loose of a standard and that essentially exemptions to the antitrust laws are disfavored."

"The FTC has a very powerful argument, and the fact that the Supreme Court went out of its way in Phoebe Putney to deliver the message that exemptions are disfavored doesn't help the North Carolina Dentistry Board."


John Commins is a senior editor with HealthLeaders Media.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

1 comments on "SCOTUS Review of NC Board Case 'A Very Big Deal' to Providers"


Brett Snodgrass, MD (5/19/2014 at 7:28 PM)
Should state medical board members have any accountability for their decision making. Furthermore, there is a physician shortage, and every week I see patients who are forced to go without quality care because the medical board is permitted, by law, to make the following types of decisions. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1401460#t=comments The impetus for the 1986 HCQIA was well-founded, but the current practice actually (1) ignores patient harm, (2) reprimands the reporting of patients harm, (3) relates a hostile ACGME program to be the standard of quality and objectivity, and (4) honesty is determined by academic title alone.