State Health Benefit Mandates Come with New Costs
The NIH study looks at Maryland and its 67 mandates to develop an example of what a state mandate liability might be. One analysis shows that Maryland's liability for mandates in 2016 would range from $10 million to $80 million depending on the benchmark plan selected. That may sound like a lot of money, but it's a drop in the bucket for most state budgets.
Looking ahead to 2014 when health insurance coverage will begin through state exchanges, the study suggests that the exchanges will provide states with new and more effective ways to regulate benefits in the individual and small group markets.
"Since states will be selecting a benchmark plan to regulate the benefits covered, the regulatory focus can shift from service-specific benefit mandates to a broader focus on the overall scope of benefits that are covered."
The study further notes that states may use their authority to certify qualified health plans as a way to exclude plans that offer inadequate benefits. "This authority can be used in addition to—or instead of—benefit mandates."
Margaret Dick Tocknell is a reporter/editor with HealthLeaders Media.
- $6.4B Henry Ford, Beaumont Merger Failed on Cultural Hurdles
- Don't Let Nurses Sink Your Bottom Line
- Fortunately, Angelina Jolie Isn't On Medicare
- Hospitals Profit On Bloodstream Infections
- Less Blood Testing for Some Surgeries Safe, Cost Effective
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- House Lawmakers Grill CMS Over Health Exchange Navigators
- Lower ED Margins Demand a Better Strategy
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions