Medicare Pays Billions for Wasteful Care
A First Step
"Part of our goal is to develop a tool that can flexibly answer these questions, like how are these services changing over time. And how are these services responding to reform incentives and different guidelines," Schwartz says.
"We like to say, if you can't measure it, you can't improve it, and this is the first step in that direction, to learn the extent of overuse and what can be done about it."
In an accompanying editorial in the same issue of JAMA Internal Medicine, editors Mitchell Katz, MD; Deborah Grady, MD, and Rita Redberg, MD, wrote that the article by Schwartz, et al "is an important contribution" in the drive to measure unnecessary care," and "will ultimately spur development of interventions to reduce unnecessary care."
Cheryl Clark is senior quality editor and California correspondent for HealthLeaders Media. She is a member of the Association of Health Care Journalists.
- mHealth Tackles Readmissions
- 'Kafkaesque' Value System Unfairly Penalizes Doctor Pay
- CNO Leads $1M Charge for New Scrubs, Uniforms
- Targeting Self-Insured Populations
- MA an Insurance Proving Ground for Providers
- Proton Beam Therapy Poised for Growth in US
- Sharp HealthCare Leaves Pioneer ACO Program
- Some Cancer Hospitals' Quality Data Will Soon Be Public
- Half of All Primary Care, Internal Medicine Jobs Unfilled in 2013
- Docs Fret as HHS Addresses Malpractice Reporting 'Loopholes'