Physicians Urged to Become 'Political Advocates' for Patients
Metzl says becoming a political advocate on behalf of patients does not mean that a doctor has to adopt a particular political philosophy such as liberal or conservative or Democrat or Republican.
"Caring about the infrastructure and the health of people in relation to the health of their communities, it is sad for me that that would be a liberal or a conservative issue. If we really care about health, the data is pretty clear about what sorts of things people need to do to live healthy lives," he says.
"Any responsible democracy should advocate for those positions no matter what side you're aligned with. Whether or not this curriculum gets picked up by every medical school medicine itself needs to be making that argument much more loudly. Medicine needs a vocabulary for saying that infrastructure and access to healthcare are not a liberal or conservative issue. It's a societal issue. Part of what we are trying to do through this is develop a new language for medicine itself to take up some of these issues. Medicine has been far too quiet."
John Commins is a senior editor with HealthLeaders Media.
- EHR Systems 'Immature, Costly,' AMA Says
- Anthem Blue Cross, 7 CA Health Systems Create New Challenger, Business Model
- Interstate Medical Licensure Effort Advances
- Better HCAHPS Scores Protect Revenue
- Data Points to Boom in Private HIX
- How to Build a Health Plan from Scratch
- CEO Exchange: Preparing for Population Health
- Narrow Networks Cut Costs, Not Quality, Economists Say
- Insurers see cost hikes in Partners HealthCare (MA) mergers
- Malnourishment 'Epidemic' Plagues Hospitals? Really?