Sponge Solution Remains Elusive
Qualify for a free subscription to HealthLeaders magazine.
Gibbs’ work with sponge detection systems revealed a surprisingly low-tech solution in what looks like a blue plastic bag with clear slots one might hang shoes in on the back of a door. Instead of shoes, the bags hold used and unused sponges in groups of 10 that are easily accounted for at the end of the case.
Gibbs and Harder emphasize that preventing RSIs isn’t just about avoiding the actual forgotten object being left inside a patient. It’s also about preventing the chaos, wasted time, x-rays, panic, and annoyance that pervade the surgical theater when a miscount occurs.
The team tears apart the room, searches behind the drapes, and gives each other side-glances while the clock is ticking for the anesthetized patient and the next operative case waits outside.
But fixing the problem of miscount has not been a top priority at many hospitals, Gibbs says. That’s because teams don’t get it and the C-suite doesn’t become engaged until an actual case of a retained sponge occurs, she says. “If they have one event, they say, ‘We had one event.’ They don’t jump up and down. Then they have another retained sponge, maybe a year later.”
The fact is, many cases are never litigated; if they are, they’re settled, and if they go to court, verdicts run around $50,000 to $100,000, Gibbs says, which isn’t enough to prompt a hospital to buy in to a major systemwide fix.
Then they get the third case. “That’s when they call me up and say ‘We have a problem’ and ask for advice.”
Someday, creative thinkers may figure out a dependable technological means to account for all these items in an unobtrusive, cost-effective, and reliable way. But until that day comes, the change has to come in the culture, Gibbs says.
“That’s why all this new technology stuff is not going to be the answer,” Gibbs says. “The answer is working with doctors, nurses, anesthesiologists, and radiologists—to work together to make sure we don’t leave our surgical tools in patients.”
Cheryl Clark is senior quality editor and California correspondent for HealthLeaders Media. She is a member of the Association of Health Care Journalists.
- MU Compliance Announcement Sparks Concern, Confusion
- New G-Codes to Pay Doctors for Broad Array of Non-Face-to-Face Care
- Scary Financial Challenges for 2014
- Telehealth Improves Patient Care in ICUs
- CMS Sets 2014 Pay Rates for Hospital Outpatient and Physician Services
- 1 in 5 CT Screenings for Lung Cancer Results in Overdiagnosis
- MGMA Urges 'End-to-End' ICD-10 Testing
- LifePoint Bolsters Presence in Michigan's Upper Peninsula
- States Rejecting Medicaid Expansion Forgo Billions in Federal Funds
- Douglas Hawthorne—A Chance to Do Something Big