After Infections, Hope for Exeter Hospital
Keep talking about it
So far, Exeter has done a decent job of managing public perception of the organization, considering the breadth of the outbreak. But it's what the hospital does in coming weeks, months, and years that will determine if it will be able to get its image back on track.
At Forbes, hospital leaders found the solution was to keep talking about the situation. Though tests discovered that not a single patient was infected, and the public admission resulted in the parent health system being tied up in litigation over the situation for several years, Farah and Rubino believe continuing to inform the public was the right thing to do.
"Keeping quiet might have enabled us to avoid a prolonged court case and negative publicity, but it was never a consideration," they wrote. "We believed then, as we believe now, that our patients have a right to all information related to their health care. We value both patient safety and transparency."
Transparency is something Exeter must focus on as it continues to face inspections and other probes. Even if under normal circumstances it would not release certain results, it must do so in the next few years.
Anything less than absolute transparency while the organization is under the shadow of this outbreak will look suspicious, if not sinister.
- As Medicare Advantage Cuts Loom, Disagreement Over Program's Stability
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- Centralizing the Revenue Cycle Protects the Bottom Line
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- Doctors Feel Pressure to Accept Risk-based Reimbursement
- Employers Weigh Risks, Benefits of Private Exchanges
- Surgical Checklists Unused in 10% of Hospitals, CMS Data Shows
- Revenue Cycles Get a Boost from Simple JPEG Files