Physicians Rail at Recertification Requirements

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media , June 19, 2014

"All the boards decided to move toward a program where you didn't have the credential for life, one which had ongoing expectations for physicians to keep up to date during their practice careers, to maintain knowledge, and take on various other responsibilities that frankly, 20 years ago, physicians didn't have," Baron says.

Waited 'Til The Last Minute

"The board had an expectation that doctors would keep up continuously over each 10 year period, but most waited until year 8.5 and then did what was meant to be 10 years worth of programs in 1.5 years," Baron says. "They complained. 'Boy, it's so demanding all these things you're making us do and we don't have time.' "

So the ABIM put its foot down, saying that by January, 2014, doctors would have to satisfy certain performance and education criteria in a series of cycles rather than procrastinate until the last few months to do it all.

ABIM says it is listening to the doctors, and Baron issued this response to the petition in April. But so far, it is not about to budge, Baron says.

Much of the objection is coming from older doctors whose training did not include measuring and improving performance "as a core part of what you do as a doctor. And now, knowledge and expectations for what a doctor should do are changing."

Baron says that in the last 10 years, studies show enormous gaps between what doctors think they do and what they actually do for their patients, and that's why chart review is now being required to assess care.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

9 comments on "Physicians Rail at Recertification Requirements"


Daniel Ramirez (9/16/2014 at 5:10 PM)
Connie, I hope you can forgive my impertinence, but it does not surprise me that you are a... nurse coordinator? ... What board do you sit on? Are you really down here in the mud with the rest of us taking care of PATIENTS on a daily basis? Or do you come down from your desk job perch from time to time to dictate to others?

Daniel Ramirez (9/16/2014 at 5:06 PM)
As a physician I try hard to do the right thing by my patients - ALWAYS. I take pride in my work, and am willing to abide by the rules. But I know a rat when I smell one. You mean to tell me that after ALL of my years of schooling, training, test taking... my board-certification, reimbursement, good standing in my profession, and perhaps even my LICENSE is being held hostage by non-practicing bureaucrat physicians? Unless I play by their silly rules that have ZERO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE to making me a better doctor???? Sirs and Madams in your ivory towers: you can all go straight to hell. This is a SCAM.

Paul Kempen, MD, PhD (7/7/2014 at 12:36 PM)
Ms Clark has actively supported the positions of the ABIM, which is a private corporation recently having invented MOC for their own corporate profits, certification already costing currently $400 million a year in gross receipts and paying their CEO salaries as high as $1.2 million in 2009. They have not been able to demonstrate Certification improves care, yet alone that MOC impacts care in outcome based study. They have even authored and published in 2002 an attempt at meta-analysis to prove Certification matters-but found this was impossible due to the poor quality of all prior studies, describing the "proof" as a "missing link" in the title (Sharp LK, Bashook PG, Lipsky MS, Horowitz SD, Miller SH. Specialty board certification and clinical outcomes: the missing link. Acad Med 2002;77:534–42). The assumption that doctors are not "up to date" is further unfounded, as life long learning is essential to continue in practice and obtain state licenses. The fact that numerous state and national oversight mechanisms exist is ignored, as Ms Clark choses to support the ABMS to be her particular brand of reassurance-as unfounded as that is. I pointed repeatedly to ABMS written articles confirming there is a lack of evidence to support certification and their MOC program, while studying and publishing comprehensive reports to the contrary (Kempen PM. Maintenance of certification and licensure: regulatory capture of medicine. Anesth Analg. 2014 Jun;118(6):1378-86. ) as have others. As for practice improvement modules: These include changing patient care without patients being informed of any risks, costs or dangers-while the sole purpose is for a doctor to personally profit=MOC re-certification. Research for personal benefit and without informed consent was internationally outlawed after WWII by the Nuremberg laws and subsequently validated among all civilized societies by the Helsinki declarations. Society DEMANDS that informed consent be required and that safety and review be assured for every patient in any experiemental setting. Validation of physician competence IS already being verified by multiple agencies including hospital and state medical boards who DO have practice authority, which the ABMS does not have. We do not provide free license to anyone to experiment with human life. This is exactly what the ABMS is forcing, while actually doing nothing to insure physician quality. Next time you go to your doctor ask him if he is MOC compliant and including you in his personal profiting MOC experiment. Be sure to ask what YOUR risks and costs will be to assure the ABMS that he is practicing medicine in YOUR and not the ABMS's best interest!

MOST POPULAR

SPONSORED REPORTS
SPONSORED HEADLINES

SIGN UP

FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine

SPONSORSHIP & ADVERTISING

100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027

800-727-5257

About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2014 a division of BLR All rights reserved.