How Providers First Did More Harm This Week
Problems in dialysis quality were also highlighted in a series of investigative stories published this week by ProPublica, which promises to post center-specific quality data that may provoke long-overdue improvements in care for end-stage renal disease patients, and a more thorough examination of why disparities exist.
The third example of how hospitals ended up doing more harm than good involves a report showing major geographic variation throughout the country in the frequency with which physicians prescribe potentially harmful medications to patients age 65 and older.
Yuting Zhang and colleagues at the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health looked at 306 Dartmouth Atlas referral regions in the U.S. as they were in 2007. The maps show five levels of frequency of dangerous drug prescribing practices for two types of prescription pitfalls:
- prescribing drugs that are potentially dangerous for seniors in general, and
- prescribing drugs that have potentially harmful drug disease interactions.
- Nurse Ethics Comes to a Head at Guantanamo Bay
- Providers' Push to Consolidate Roils Payers
- Transforming Decision Support and Reporting
- How to navigate big data in healthcare
- Insurers' listings of in-network doctors often out of date
- In Lakeport, CA, a Population Health Laboratory is Born
- CMS Mulls Income-Adjusting MA Stars
- Opinion: What healthcare can learn from CHS data breach
- Costs of responding to Ebola adding up
- How the ACA is redefining health insurance coverage