CMS’ Final HAC Rule Baffles Hospitals
For example, Hospital A would not receive payment for expanded care required for a patient who developed a preventable stage IV pressure ulcer. But if that patient were transferred to Hospital B, Medicaid funds would pay.
But, Feldpush says, that's won't happen in any systematic way.
"That would take a degree of sophistication and almost trickery that I don't believe occurs," she said. Hospitals want to do right by their patients the first time around. We worked on this issue for many years. They want to make it right," she said.
With state coffers so distressed, it might seem prudent for the agency to provide more uniformity across state lines. That might incentivize hospitals to work harder in these categories where they are tightly compared with their peers.
It seems wrong that hospitals in some states might be held to a much lower standard in how they are penalized for causing harm. By pushing out such a vaguely worded rule, CMS may have placed a piece of the jigsaw puzzle that will take a long time to correctly fit.
Cheryl Clark is senior quality editor and California correspondent for HealthLeaders Media. She is a member of the Association of Health Care Journalists.
- 'Mega Boards' Could be Rural Healthcare Disruptor
- HL20: Lee Aase—Who's Behind @MayoClinic
- 1 in 5 Eligible Hospitals Penalized for HACs
- Meaningful Use Payment Adjustments Begin
- 12 Hires to Keep Your Hospital Out of Trouble
- No Boost to NFP Hospital Bond Ratings from Medicaid Expansion
- Ratcheting Up Patient Experience Has a Downside
- HL20: Peter Semczuk, DDS, MPH—Taking on the Big Challenges
- HL20: Rebecca Katz—Cooking Up Sustainable Nourishment
- Top 3 Nursing Lessons of 2014