Immediate Jeopardy at Parkland Puts VBP Incentive Pay in Peril
I tried to find out from CMS' Washington office, and CMS' other nine regional offices, what those numbers look like, and how many immediate jeopardies had been declared in recent years. Is there a trend, I wonder, that increases the stakes to improve and may push more hospitals out of the competition for federal payment?
But no one from other regional offices, except Region 6, answered that question before my deadline.
CMS spokeswoman Cohen in the Washington office reiterated what she told me in March: CMS doesn't have that information, although it has recently begun to track it.
In any case, hospitals should be on notice now, if they haven't been already. They may very well be locked out of the ballpark in rough and tumble competition for that $850 million. The federal definition of immediate jeopardy is extremely broad. A hospital doesn't even have to cause harm to get this designation, just allow an environment that makes it more likely to occur.
Here's one good thing about all this: It could raise quality all around.
And here's another: After CMS excludes hospitals that jeopardize patient care to this extent, there'll be more of that $850 million for everybody else.
Cheryl Clark is senior quality editor and California correspondent for HealthLeaders Media. She is a member of the Association of Health Care Journalists.
- CFO Exchange: Smartphones Poised to Disrupt Healthcare, Says Topol
- Consumerism Drives Healthcare Branding, Rebranding Efforts
- 3 Traits Personality Assessments Can't Reveal
- PA Ranks See 'Phenomenal Growth,' Lack of Diversity
- Antibiotic Overuse a 'Huge Threat' to Patient Safety, Says CDC
- CNO on Hospital Redesign: 'You Can't Over-Communicate'
- CFO Exchange: Healthcare Leaders Share 5 Innovative Ideas
- How Digital Strategy Shapes Patient Engagement at Boston Children's Hospital
- CHS Hacked, 4.5M Patient Records Compromised
- Carondelet to Pay $35M to Settle Fraud Allegations