Meaningful Use Quality Measures May Be Meaningless
NQF responded to a request for comment saying the subject is "complex terrain," but that they've taken steps to endorse and approve e-specifications. "We agree with AHA that this is a learning process— with so much evolving at once— so we must tread deliberately, but carefully, into implementation."
"NQF agrees with AHA on the need for testing of eMeasures. Testing by measure developers is a critical step to ensure the measures can produce the intended result running on an electronic platform."
Hospitals Question Usability, Point to Inconsistencies
Unfortunately, the problems persist. In a 68-page letter to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services April 30, AHA executive vice president Rick Pollack pleaded for a delay in proposed rules for the Meaningful Use Stage 2 incentive payments because of all these problems.
"'We have heard from many members hospitals/CAHs (critical access hospitals) that all stakeholders – measure developers, the National Quality Forum, CMS, vendors and providers – need much more time to get the process right."
- Providers' Push to Consolidate Roils Payers
- As Retail Clinics Surge, Quality Metrics MIA
- Former NQF Co-Chair Linked to Conflicts of Interest in Journal Probe
- Medicare Cost, Quality Data Tools Weak, Says GAO
- CMS Mulls Income-Adjusting MA Stars
- 6 Not-So-Good Reasons for Avoiding Population Health
- No Employee Satisfaction, No Patient-Centered Culture
- Population Health Pays Off for NY Collaborative
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
- RN Named Chief Patient Experience Officer