'Last Shot' for Embattled Exeter Hospital
Poor root cause analysis
One shortcoming stands out above the others: how the hospital was performing its root cause analysis of the Kwiatkowski incident.
"The analysis did not contain the necessary scope to address all causal factors," the report says. "Although the analysis looked at infection control and medication security, it did so with a very narrow focus. Based on the findings, a much wider scope for both was necessary to establish a true root cause, providing the ability to analyze and evaluate the quality of their existing programs pertaining to infection control and medication security."
"During tour of the cardiac catheterization procedure room on 9/17/12 at 11:50 a.m.," the report continues, "medications were found in an unlocked refrigerator" and a member of the cath lab staff "confirmed that medications were not locked even during off hours." And the hospital had still, during the September federal inspection, not figured out how to secure medications in the cath lab, to which Kwiatkowski allegedly had unauthorized access before his termination.
You'd think after three tries, Exeter would get this thing right, so it might live past its dubious distinction as the home of the "serial infector."
As Martin warns, this is their last shot.
Cheryl Clark is senior quality editor and California correspondent for HealthLeaders Media. She is a member of the Association of Health Care Journalists.
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- 69% of Employers Plan to Offer Healthcare Coverage After 2014
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- House Lawmakers Grill CMS Over Health Exchange Navigators
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions
- Insurer's App Aims to Lower Healthcare Costs, Securely
- Don't Let Nurses Sink Your Bottom Line
- Q&A: Catholic Health Initiatives' New Senior VP for Capital Finance
- Building a Better Healthcare Board
- Fortunately, Angelina Jolie Isn't On Medicare

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.
Lisa Karakostas (11/30/2012 at 12:38 AM)
I suggest you do more research and tell the truth instead of writing such a biased, one sided, inflammatory, and misleading story. It is reprehensible you did not do due diligence prior to writing what amounts to nothing more than a tabloid type sensational piece of writing designed purely to discredit a health care organization that has been in existence for over 100 years and has repeatedly received accreditation and high quality marks from numerous regulatory agencies.