What's Wrong With Healthcare Quality Measures? Part I
5. Only some diseases are evaluated.
Only a few types of patient conditions are evaluated for core process measures, such as whether patients got an aspirin or an antibiotic when they should or whether they were readmitted. Inpatients do get care for other diseases or procedures that bring them to the hospital besides heart failure, pneumonia, heart attack, joint replacement and certain types of surgeries.
6. Emphasis for most measures from process to outcome is still evolving.
Outcomes, including mortality, infection rates and readmissions, are now being measured with federal penalties for poor outcomes. Reporting on functional outcomes, meaning whether patients can function as they might reasonably be expected after their procedures, is coming. But it's not here yet. "Despite discussion of the challenges of a rapidly expanding number of quality measures, much of health care remains poorly measured or unmeasured," Panzer wrote.
I could go on and on. And I will in next week's column, where I'll share the second half of my list. In the meantime, if you have suggestions, leave them in the comments section below or email me directly.
Cheryl Clark is senior quality editor and California correspondent for HealthLeaders Media. She is a member of the Association of Health Care Journalists.
- CNO Leads $1M Charge for New Scrubs, Uniforms
- mHealth Tackles Readmissions
- Targeting Self-Insured Populations
- MA an Insurance Proving Ground for Providers
- 'Kafkaesque' Value System Unfairly Penalizes Doctor Pay
- Sharp HealthCare Leaves Pioneer ACO Program
- Acute Kidney Injury Gets New Focus
- Some Cancer Hospitals' Quality Data Will Soon Be Public
- Half of All Primary Care, Internal Medicine Jobs Unfilled in 2013
- States Without Medicaid Expansion Search for Alternatives