Cancer Hospitals Study Yields 'Confusing' Findings
Asked how a hospital might be measured when the oncologist, radiation oncologist, and surgical oncologist perform separate functions in outpatient versus inpatient settings, Bilimoria says the system can be scored together in terms of "how well [members of the care team] work together.
"For example, how often do they hold tumor conferences and discuss the patient. That could be a measure of quality."
Problems with cancer treatment across the country are increasingly in public view. Last September, the Institute of Medicine's cancer report highlighted issues with lack of evidence-based care, inadequately credentialed providers, poorly tested regimens, and a tendency for oncologists to be less than honest
Bilimoria's research was supported by the ACS Clinical Scholars in Residence Program, the Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology and the American Cancer Society-Illinois.
Cheryl Clark is senior quality editor and California correspondent for HealthLeaders Media. She is a member of the Association of Health Care Journalists.
- As Medicare Advantage Cuts Loom, Disagreement Over Program's Stability
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- Centralizing the Revenue Cycle Protects the Bottom Line
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- Doctors Feel Pressure to Accept Risk-based Reimbursement
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- Surgical Checklists Unused in 10% of Hospitals, CMS Data Shows
- Employers Weigh Risks, Benefits of Private Exchanges
- Revenue Cycles Get a Boost from Simple JPEG Files