FDA's Medical Device ID System Still Inactive
If the U.S. can't get this unique identification done, it will probably be done by another country. "There's benefit in the U.S. leading here and creating a standard that others abide by," Childs says. Recent controversy in Europe about recalled breast implants have catalyzed efforts there.
Ultimately, though, it will be up to those of you reading this—hospital executives and your peers in medical practices, as well as payers—to insist upon well-labeled medical devices in your purchasing decisions. Premier represents hospitals but does not have the power to require hospitals to buy uniquely-identified devices.
So I'll put it in a way that may really provoke a few of you.
A few years from now, if hospitals are competing with Wal-Mart and the pharmacies for a slice of the ACO pie, would you want them to be miles ahead in insisting on such a simple patient safety strategy, while hospitals dither? Will patient safety groups end up recommending purchase of medical devices through Wal-Mart?
Fortunately, medical devices are regulated, and this law is, in fact, law. So it shouldn't come to that. Should it?
By the way, AdvaMed, the Washington-based association for the medical device industry, put out a generally supportive statement on S.1995. If you buy truckloads of devices from AdvaMed's members, now would be a good time to let them know they should be putting more actions behind their words.
Scott Mace is senior technology editor at HealthLeaders Media.
- In Lakeport, CA, a Population Health Laboratory is Born
- Nurse Ethics Comes to a Head at Guantanamo Bay
- Transforming Decision Support and Reporting
- Providers' Push to Consolidate Roils Payers
- CMS Mulls Income-Adjusting MA Stars
- As Retail Clinics Surge, Quality Metrics MIA
- Insurers' listings of in-network doctors often out of date
- How to navigate big data in healthcare
- Providers Prep for New Payment Models as Population Health Grows
- Opinion: What healthcare can learn from CHS data breach