Find the Right Pace for Innovation
But for some hospitals and systems, this could mean a 20% or 30% adjustment to the revenues they are used to, including many of the top hospitals and health systems in the country—at least according to public opinion.
Fenstermaker says whether most or even many hospitals and health systems will ultimately be able to navigate such a drastic change depends on coordination of the shift between private payers and the government, although perhaps that's wishful thinking—sort of like betting that Congress will cooperate.
"The government and [commercial] payer side need to move at the same pace," he says. "If you have half on capitation but the rest is fee-for-service, that's going to create a mess. That's what happened in the 90's and it made HMOs fail."
A further shift toward paying for value will come with so-called bundled payments, though despite their prominence in public discussions and in industry circles such as HealthLeaders magazine, they have yet to be widely or even narrowly, implemented.
"The system has to change in this direction," says Fenstermaker. Combined payments will drive out costs…but unless the system gets integrated, where specialists' and hospitals' incentives are aligned, the whole thing will fail."
Philip Betbeze is senior leadership editor with HealthLeaders Media.
- $6.4B Henry Ford, Beaumont Merger Failed on Cultural Hurdles
- Don't Let Nurses Sink Your Bottom Line
- Hospitals Profit On Bloodstream Infections
- Fortunately, Angelina Jolie Isn't On Medicare
- Less Blood Testing for Some Surgeries Safe, Cost Effective
- Lower ED Margins Demand a Better Strategy
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- House Lawmakers Grill CMS Over Health Exchange Navigators
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions