Medicare Pay 'Transparency' Divides Physicians
Another physician, Kenneth Maxwell, MD, from Winston Salem, NC, wrote to ACPE: "What purpose does this action serve? Publishing the amount of Medicare reimbursement without some form of normative information provides no useful information for consumers.
Despite the split among the ACPE, Angood, the group's leader, believes that the overall move toward "greater transparency in medicine and increased public reporting" is necessary and here to stay.
The differences within his group show that government regulators need to "throw up a flag of caution" as they consider all the policy changes, Angood says. "Part of our job as physician leaders is to help ensure that when health care data is presented to the public, it is accurate, fair, meaningful and useful."
Angood may have been surprised by the nearly even vote in the poll results, but not the underlying reasons why.
It reflects the "degree of the sense of disenfranchisement many physicians have," Angood says. "And when any human starts to get disenfranchised, they begin to get suspicious about what motivates the external voices changing their environment."
Joe Cantlupe is a senior editor with HealthLeaders Media Online.
- Reform Puts Vise Grips on Physicians
- Medicare Opt-Out a Viable Physician Strategy
- Look Beyond Nurse-Patient Ratios
- Boston Marathon Bombing Yields Lessons for Hospitals
- How Physicians Can Help Ease Mental Health Provider Shortages
- NPP Demand Rising Under Value-Based Care Models
- Providers Lag as Consumers Set Agenda
- Physicians as Economic Powerhouses and Tech Laggards
- Hospital Groups Back NQF Report on Patient Sociodemographics
- The Flourishing Medical Tourism Business in America