Peer Messengers Help Docs Get Back On Track
The peer messengers tap into data about specific behaviors or clinical outcomes used by the university's Center for Patient and Professional Advocacy (CPPA). They schedule "confidential collegial visits" with identified physicians to share data about their standing, compared to local and national CPPA norms related to the complaints. Data is shared with targeted physicians in a 'respective, non-punitive, nonjudgmental, and nondirective fashion," Pichert wrote.
The peer messengers are "willing to intervene with colleagues over an extended period of time," Pichert says.
If anything, the peer messengers are told to avoid any tendency to be "fixers" of problems. If necessary, they initiate a process for additional hospital intervention if they don't make inroads in helping the physicians.
To improve physician clinical work and behavior, two elements are among the most important for success, Pichert says: hospital leadership and the doctors under review themselves.
"Overall success of an intervention process depends not only on peer willingness and skill to provide feedback but also on leaders who will hold others accountable," Pichert writes in the report.
Ultimately, Pichert told me, it is "self-regulation" among the physicians themselves that matters most.
Joe Cantlupe is a senior editor with HealthLeaders Media Online.
- How Top-Ranked MA Plans Earn Their Stars
- Readmissions: No Quick Fix to Costly Hospital Challenge
- How Hospitals Can Become 'Upstreamists'
- 4 Ways to Lower the Cost to Collect from Self-Pay Patients
- House Calls Key to Pioneer ACO Success
- How Telehealth Pays Off for Providers, Patients
- 4 Tips for Managing Employed Physicians
- WellPoint Dominates Nearly Half of Markets, AMA Says
- Defensive Medicine Still Prevalent Despite Tort Reform
- CMS Offers Some ACOs $114M for 'Upfront' Costs