Surgical Site Infections Persist, But Why?
'Challenging to understand'
However, Faraday makes an extremely important point that we need to know much more about the pathophysiology of infectious disease in surgical settings. And whether some people's genetic profiles are just unlucky.
"The thing that's challenging to understand, what makes it difficult for me, is that we see these cases all the time where it looks like everything has gone the same way, every (protocol) was followed, and yet why did this one in 20 or one in 100 patients get infected? It's very disturbing. And just saying something went wrong at the time of surgery clearly isn't the full answer."
Surgical site infections are terrible, I am well aware, indeed from witnessing horrifying experiences among a few friends. Nationally, researchers estimate there are 1.7 million healthcare-associated infections and 99,000 deaths each year, and 17% of those are due to surgical site infections.
Surgical site infections alone are estimated to cost $3.5 billion to $10 billion a year in healthcare costs. So it seems this would certainly be a place where research dollars would be well spent.
Cheryl Clark is senior quality editor and California correspondent for HealthLeaders Media. She is a member of the Association of Health Care Journalists.
- mHealth Tackles Readmissions
- 'Kafkaesque' Value System Unfairly Penalizes Doctor Pay
- CNO Leads $1M Charge for New Scrubs, Uniforms
- Targeting Self-Insured Populations
- MA an Insurance Proving Ground for Providers
- Proton Beam Therapy Poised for Growth in US
- Sharp HealthCare Leaves Pioneer ACO Program
- Some Cancer Hospitals' Quality Data Will Soon Be Public
- Half of All Primary Care, Internal Medicine Jobs Unfilled in 2013
- Docs Fret as HHS Addresses Malpractice Reporting 'Loopholes'