Surgical Site Infections Persist, But Why?
'Challenging to understand'
However, Faraday makes an extremely important point that we need to know much more about the pathophysiology of infectious disease in surgical settings. And whether some people's genetic profiles are just unlucky.
"The thing that's challenging to understand, what makes it difficult for me, is that we see these cases all the time where it looks like everything has gone the same way, every (protocol) was followed, and yet why did this one in 20 or one in 100 patients get infected? It's very disturbing. And just saying something went wrong at the time of surgery clearly isn't the full answer."
Surgical site infections are terrible, I am well aware, indeed from witnessing horrifying experiences among a few friends. Nationally, researchers estimate there are 1.7 million healthcare-associated infections and 99,000 deaths each year, and 17% of those are due to surgical site infections.
Surgical site infections alone are estimated to cost $3.5 billion to $10 billion a year in healthcare costs. So it seems this would certainly be a place where research dollars would be well spent.
Cheryl Clark is senior quality editor and California correspondent for HealthLeaders Media. She is a member of the Association of Health Care Journalists.
- CMS Sets 2014 Pay Rates for Hospital Outpatient and Physician Services
- New G-Codes to Pay Doctors for Broad Array of Non-Face-to-Face Care
- FDA hopes hospitals will switch to newly regulated pharmacies
- States Rejecting Medicaid Expansion Forgo Billions in Federal Funds
- Why You Should Involve Patients in Nursing Handoffs
- Not-for-Profit Hospitals Find Opportunity Amid Uncertainty
- Douglas Hawthorne—A Chance to Do Something Big
- Substance Abuse Resurfaces Among Anesthesiologists in Training
- The 5 Biggest Healthcare Finance Trouble Spots
- The Most Polarizing Topics in Healthcare IT