Surgical Site Infections Persist, But Why?
'Challenging to understand'
However, Faraday makes an extremely important point that we need to know much more about the pathophysiology of infectious disease in surgical settings. And whether some people's genetic profiles are just unlucky.
"The thing that's challenging to understand, what makes it difficult for me, is that we see these cases all the time where it looks like everything has gone the same way, every (protocol) was followed, and yet why did this one in 20 or one in 100 patients get infected? It's very disturbing. And just saying something went wrong at the time of surgery clearly isn't the full answer."
Surgical site infections are terrible, I am well aware, indeed from witnessing horrifying experiences among a few friends. Nationally, researchers estimate there are 1.7 million healthcare-associated infections and 99,000 deaths each year, and 17% of those are due to surgical site infections.
Surgical site infections alone are estimated to cost $3.5 billion to $10 billion a year in healthcare costs. So it seems this would certainly be a place where research dollars would be well spent.
Cheryl Clark is senior quality editor and California correspondent for HealthLeaders Media. She is a member of the Association of Health Care Journalists.
- Drug Pricing 'Tantamount to Greed,' Lawmaker Says
- Study Puts Spotlight on Preventing Fall-Related Injuries
- CVS Ramps Up Retail Clinics with Provider Affiliations
- Surgical Checklists Unused in 10% of Hospitals, CMS Data Shows
- Wanted: Nurse PhDs
- The Infection-Busting Treatment Payers Don’t Want to Talk About
- 4 Tectonic Shifts Shaking Up Healthcare
- Contradictory Obamacare Rulings Issued by Appellate Courts
- As HIPAA Breaches Accelerate, Tools Lag
- Doctors Feel Pressure to Accept Risk-based Reimbursement