Surgical Site Infections Persist, But Why?
'Challenging to understand'
However, Faraday makes an extremely important point that we need to know much more about the pathophysiology of infectious disease in surgical settings. And whether some people's genetic profiles are just unlucky.
"The thing that's challenging to understand, what makes it difficult for me, is that we see these cases all the time where it looks like everything has gone the same way, every (protocol) was followed, and yet why did this one in 20 or one in 100 patients get infected? It's very disturbing. And just saying something went wrong at the time of surgery clearly isn't the full answer."
Surgical site infections are terrible, I am well aware, indeed from witnessing horrifying experiences among a few friends. Nationally, researchers estimate there are 1.7 million healthcare-associated infections and 99,000 deaths each year, and 17% of those are due to surgical site infections.
Surgical site infections alone are estimated to cost $3.5 billion to $10 billion a year in healthcare costs. So it seems this would certainly be a place where research dollars would be well spent.
Cheryl Clark is senior quality editor and California correspondent for HealthLeaders Media. She is a member of the Association of Health Care Journalists.
- Providers Lag as Consumers Set Agenda
- ICD-10 Delay Alters Provider, Vendor Prep
- Esther Dyson Launches Population Health Challenge
- Crisis Spurs Healthcare Payment Reform in Arkansas
- Payment Reform Naysayers 'Better Wake Up'
- Look Beyond Nurse-Patient Ratios
- HIT Leaders Want Flexibility, Transparency from Next HHS Chief
- As Hospitalist Patient Loads Rise, So Do Hospital Costs
- Reduce Readmissions by Activating Patients to Do 'Self-Care'
- Advance Directives: Let's Make a Law