Hospitals Give Leapfrog Safety Scores a Failing Grade
Second, Binder underscores that the measurement strategy was determined by nine of the nation's top safety experts, including Lucian Leape, MD, of Harvard; John Birkmeyer, MD, of the University of Michigan; Peter Pronovost, MD, of Johns Hopkins University; Robert Wachter, MD, of the University of California San Francisco and Ashish Jha, MD, of Harvard.
"In the long run, it is likely we will set fixed safety standards and grade hospitals against those standards, but first we need better information about what standards are reasonable and feasible. We can only know that through comparative analysis right now," she says.
The fact of the matter, she says, is that "there are significant differences among hospitals in their level of safety, and that is what is reflected in the score."
Binder says that if and when Medicare stops reporting on a measure, or the expert panel concludes it's no longer eligible for the Hospital Safety Score, "we will remove it."
As she told me several weeks ago when she described the purpose of this new scorecard: "People deserve to know that some hospitals are safer than others."
Cheryl Clark is senior quality editor and California correspondent for HealthLeaders Media. She is a member of the Association of Health Care Journalists.
- As Medicare Advantage Cuts Loom, Disagreement Over Program's Stability
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- Centralizing the Revenue Cycle Protects the Bottom Line
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- Doctors Feel Pressure to Accept Risk-based Reimbursement
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- Surgical Checklists Unused in 10% of Hospitals, CMS Data Shows
- Employers Weigh Risks, Benefits of Private Exchanges
- Revenue Cycles Get a Boost from Simple JPEG Files