Hospitals Give Leapfrog Safety Scores a Failing Grade
Second, Binder underscores that the measurement strategy was determined by nine of the nation's top safety experts, including Lucian Leape, MD, of Harvard; John Birkmeyer, MD, of the University of Michigan; Peter Pronovost, MD, of Johns Hopkins University; Robert Wachter, MD, of the University of California San Francisco and Ashish Jha, MD, of Harvard.
"In the long run, it is likely we will set fixed safety standards and grade hospitals against those standards, but first we need better information about what standards are reasonable and feasible. We can only know that through comparative analysis right now," she says.
The fact of the matter, she says, is that "there are significant differences among hospitals in their level of safety, and that is what is reflected in the score."
Binder says that if and when Medicare stops reporting on a measure, or the expert panel concludes it's no longer eligible for the Hospital Safety Score, "we will remove it."
As she told me several weeks ago when she described the purpose of this new scorecard: "People deserve to know that some hospitals are safer than others."
Cheryl Clark is senior quality editor and California correspondent for HealthLeaders Media. She is a member of the Association of Health Care Journalists.
- $6.4B Henry Ford, Beaumont Merger Failed on Cultural Hurdles
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- House Lawmakers Grill CMS Over Health Exchange Navigators
- Fortunately, Angelina Jolie Isn't On Medicare
- Don't Let Nurses Sink Your Bottom Line
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions
- Insurer's App Aims to Lower Healthcare Costs, Securely
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- Uncompensated Care Faces a Double Hit in Some States
- Hospital Pricing Transparency a Marketing Game Changer