Physicians' Diagnostic Overconfidence May be Harming Patients
They were then asked "Given all information provided, what one diagnosis concerning the chief complaint is most likely?"
They were then asked if they would order additional labs and imaging, seek a second opinion from a colleague within internal medicine, seek a "curbside" or more informal consult with another doctor, seek a formal referral from a specialist or use reference materials, such as internet and electronic medical documents or books.
The physicians tested had a mean experience level of 16.5 years. Six in 10 were born in the U.S. and nearly two-thirds received a U.S. medical education and 61% were affiliated with non-academic institutions.
In an invited commentary, Gurpreet Dhaliwal, MD, of the University of California San Francisco Department of Medicine, said Singh's and Meyer's report "suggest that physicians may not request the full complement of point-of-care resources—references and colleagues—to facilitate diagnosis when we need it the most, and that confidence is not a reliable indicator of when we need help."
Cheryl Clark is senior quality editor and California correspondent for HealthLeaders Media. She is a member of the Association of Health Care Journalists.
- Providers' Push to Consolidate Roils Payers
- Former NQF Co-Chair Linked to Conflicts of Interest in Journal Probe
- As Retail Clinics Surge, Quality Metrics MIA
- RN Named Chief Patient Experience Officer
- Medicare Cost, Quality Data Tools Weak, Says GAO
- No Employee Satisfaction, No Patient-Centered Culture
- Six Not-So-Good Reasons for Avoiding Population Health
- In PCMH, the 'P' is Not for 'Physician'
- Population Health Pays Off for NY Collaborative
- How Simple Data Analytics is Driving Physician Incentives