IBM's Watson Heads for Clinics, Spurring Debate
But techniques such as Watson may also crack some of healthcare's harder nuts, such as how to decide on a course of treatment when multiple chronic diseases are present. For instance, should the physician treat congestive heart failure at the risk of making the same patient's asthma worse?
In some cases, only a massive speed-read of all available literature may be able to help suggest answers to that question and others like it.
Meanwhile, the debate about the role of AI in healthcare is just getting started. I expect a vigorous set of put-downs of Watson in the comments on this column. But just as I wouldn't have bet against Wikipedia or Google, I'm not going to bet against this technology's value either. After all, even Wikipedia and Google have assumed a certain role in today's healthcare technology puzzle, even if it's only to advise patients while they wait for their specialist appointments. (And what doctor doesn't use Google in his or her research?)
In the near future, even the medical experts will find themselves more dependent on and appreciative of ever more technology-fueled answers as well.
Scott Mace is senior technology editor at HealthLeaders Media.
- The Secret to Physician Engagement? It's Not Better Pay
- Two-Midnight Rule Must be Fixed or Replaced, Say Providers
- Don't Underestimate Emotional Intelligence
- Yale New Haven Health Partners with Tenet Healthcare in CT
- Care Coordination Tough to Define, Measure
- 4 Reasons PCMH Principles Aren't Going Away
- Size Matters in Antibiotic Overuse
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
- CDC Warns of Antibiotic Overuse in Hospitals
- SCOTUS Review of NC Board Case 'A Very Big Deal' to Providers