ICD-10 Delay Alters Provider, Vendor Prep
"We are hearing they are going to use this time to continue to work with their physicians on clinical documentation improvements, whether they're using ICD-9 or ICD-10. People are going to continue to do that. They are continuing to work with their vendors to get ready for ICD-10," she says.
"As far as the resources, what I heard at the CCHIIM meeting from our members in the room is that they're saying if we can afford it, we would love to continue to do dual coding. The question is can you continue to afford it? Maybe some of the larger academic medical centers and institutions can and we know that ICD-10 is better because it has more granularity and specificity. As we go to the accountable care models, you are really going to need this specificity to make sure you have healthier communities."
"I would say to providers, 'stay the course and don't take your foot off the pedal. Continue in good faith to get ready. It will come. It's just a shame it's not as soon as we thought.'"
John Commins is a senior editor with HealthLeaders Media.
- Will More Pioneer ACOs Defect?
- Charity HealthCare Conundrum Brewing Among Providers
- Interventional Radiology No Longer a Sub-Specialty
- MU Final Rule Disappoints Some CIOs
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
- NFP Hospitals' Revenue Growth at 'All-Time Low'
- Acute Kidney Injury Gets New Focus
- mHealth Tackles Readmissions
- CNO Leads $1M Charge for New Scrubs, Uniforms
- Transforming Cancer Care