Intelligence Unit Special Reports Special Events Subscribe Sponsored Departments Follow Us

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn RSS

AEDs in Hospitals Fail to Improve Survival Odds

In some circumstances, hospital use of automated external defibrillators is associated with higher death rates when compared to traditional defibrillators, study shows.

1 comments on "AEDs in Hospitals Fail to Improve Survival Odds"
John Stewart RN, MA (1/7/2011 at 3:53 PM)

This is a very important study. As a hospital nurse, I have long been concerned with the problem of delayed in-hospital defibrillation. It is really a HUGE problem, resulting in a few unnecessary deaths each year in just about every hospital. I believe the initial proportion of shockable rhythms is significantly larger than reported in this and other in-hospital studies, because delays in initial monitoring allow time to decay into flatline. The AHA made a big mistake years ago in tying early defibrillation in hospitals to purchase of AEDs[INVALID]I tried to tell them then, but they didn't listen. The cynic in me says that AHA ties to the defibrillator makers was a factor. Anyway, I think it's feasible to train nurses to defibrillate effectively using any defibrillators you have. See my article at