Intelligence Unit Special Reports Special Events Subscribe Sponsored Departments Follow Us

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn RSS

Consumer Group Wants Full Access to National Practitioner Data Base



Physicians' group gives mixed reviews to a consumer advocacy group's call for full and unfettered public access to the National Practitioner Data Base to help patients identify problem doctors in their states.



1 comments on "Consumer Group Wants Full Access to National Practitioner Data Base"
Roger Downey (11/18/2011 at 3:33 PM)

I am only familiar with the Arizona Medical Board. It posts the disciplinary actions it takes against physicians in the physician profiles available on the Board's Web site. The date of the discipline is the hyperlink to the legal documents detailing the facts of the case and the state law that was violated. You can also see when the physician was first licensed in Arizona and when the license renewal date is. Also in the profile is the physician's education and training history and the area of interest or specialty. So, Arizona already provides much of the information that people would find in the NPDB regarding disciplinary action. Some issues are confidential and must remain that way. For instance, if a physician contacts the Board and self-reports a problem with substance abuse, the Board treats this as a confidential, non-disciplinary action to help the physician recover. Physicians with this problem are often sent to a treatment center for assessment and rehabilitation. But this only works for the first offense. If the physician relapses, the Board takes public, disciplinary action against the doctor. But you can understand why the self-report needs to stay confidential. Who would self-report if his action was on the Internet or accessible by the public the next day? By the way, an Arizona physician with a substance abuse problem may only return to practice on the recommendation of the treatment facility and with Board approval. Some medical boards keep much of the disciplinary actions against doctors confidential, usually because of the lobbying efforts by county and state medical societies. If the consumer advocates want real reform, they need to work at the state medical board and state legislature level to make this information available on the Internet.