Intelligence Unit Special Reports Special Events Subscribe Sponsored Departments Follow Us

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn RSS

Hospitals' Fear of 30-Day Penalties May Speed Hospice Admissions



An exception to federal 30-day mortality measures may incent hospitals to prematurely push patients into hospice care, says one critic, who calls it an unintended consequence of healthcare reform.



5 comments on "Hospitals' Fear of 30-Day Penalties May Speed Hospice Admissions"
James Sinclair, M.D. (6/27/2013 at 4:10 PM)

Excellent point and counter-point. CMS will soon be making public outcomes data regarding our own patient's 30 day mortality rate from agressive intervention such as last chemotherapy given. If peer review could put pressure on us to see our failure in appropriate hospice referral then I agree we wouldn't need payer oversight.
Michael D. Fratkin,MD (6/14/2013 at 9:08 AM)

If the effect of the ridiculous 24 hour timeframe is that hospitals dig deeper to resource and staff Palliative Care programs, I can live with the social engineering of the federal guidelines. It seems more likely, at least in my neck of the woods, that already strapped community hospitals will just try to lean on their underfunded, understaffed, and under-resourced Palliative Care "Teams" (I am a "team" of one) to impossibly improve this metric. The desired outcome is to accelerate the conversations that define patient and family desires and values to occur prior to the initiation of any treatment plan....at admission. The culture change required to give time and space for this discussion at the moment of admission is vast. It's not going to be successful putting a Palliative Medicine provider into every hospital admission process. Rather, it will be nessecary for the incentives to favor the TIME it takes to have these conversations at admission by the admitting physician/provider. The pace, pressure, workloads, lean staffing, rising documentation requirements, and the quantification of 'quality medical care' all work to speed the admission process up and pull the provider from the central human dilemma of our patients understanding the reality of their circumstances and choosing their own path. The solution awaits us at the bedside if our systems can accommodate another 15-30 minutes to meet these people on their own terms rather than in terms of their role as data in an industrial medical machine.
T R Patterson (6/12/2013 at 4:18 PM)

As an HPM doc who practiced so far 35 years, I feel there is merit in the claim that incentives will be followed by actions. Anyone who doesn't see this has not watched medicine evolve. BUT, the real question, I feel, is WHY are doctors not asking questions that raise end of life care and getting answers long before the terminal hospitalization. A large percentage of elderly patients, and those with life limiting diseases are KNOWN to be at risk well before. We as doctors have allowed (encouraged?) the myth that we can fix anything and extend life for over two generations! Are we surprised now when no one wants to ration care or allow death to be a natural part of life? We must get directives before the crisis develops- it is too hard in a crunch for most patients and families to suddenly confront death when they have been misled for so long that it won't happen.
Lisa Sams RNC, MSN (6/7/2013 at 1:49 PM)

Focusing on palliative and hospice care development can benefit patients. However, we should not underestimate the unintended consequence of the 24 hour decision limit. Can anyone point to evidence to show that patients, families and clinicians have all the information needed and the emotional readiness to make this call so quickly? I see this as dehumanizing, because we now have financial incentive to "mark" patients in this category during the admission...much like the approach to skin assessment. We got into the mess we are in the industry because the focus was on the numbers, bottom line and we are more focused on the bottom line...does not bode well for our patients. What will you say to your mom or dad who need to be admitted for pneumonia???
Jackeline Biddle Shuler (6/6/2013 at 6:59 PM)

As far as I am concerned palliative care is a necessary service that helps quality and patient safety. Any fiscal byproduct is just icing on the cake!