There is a real-life model in this country for the kind of sweeping healthcare change being considered in Washington, and that is in Massachusetts, where a landmark law signed in April 2006 has achieved near-universal coverage. And in that state, leaders decided from the outset to decouple access and cost, and to deal first with covering the uninsured.
Hennepin County Medical Center, a complex in downtown Minneapolis, offers a vantage point on the ways immigrants are testing the American medical establishment. The new arrivals bring distinctive patterns of illness and injury and cultural beliefs about life, death, sickness, and health. Hennepin spends $3 million a year on interpreters fluent in 50 languages to communicate effectively with its foreign-born patients.
A report shows that 34 of Maryland's 58 hospitals lost a total of $466 million during the fourth quarter of 2008 and, officials said, the picture has continued to be grim in the first months of this year. The Maryland Hospital Association, which compiled the data, said hospital finances in the state have slid to "unprecedented low levels," far worse than hospitals nationwide. The fourth-quarter loss was 10 times that for the same period in 2007, the association said.
Nobody wants to be the bearer of bad news. It's difficult and uncomfortable. For senior leaders, it's also part of the job. During the past six months, CEOs in every industry have been forced to deliver unpopular messages—AIG's Edward Liddy is probably the most notable. In healthcare, the conversations have gone something like this:
CEO to staff members: "We have to lay off employees."
CEO to board members: "We can't access capital, volumes are down, and we're losing money."
CEO to community members: "We are cutting services."
CEO to physicians: "The hospital can't afford that new CT scanner or MRI that we promised."
Terry Peeples, CEO of Jennie Stuart Medical Center in Hopkinsville, KY, says discussing potential layoffs is probably the most difficult conversation for him because it's so personal. "It hits so many people that you have worked with and depended on to provide your service," he says.
The conversations will never be easy. But there are ways to communicate bad news in a manner that minimizes fallout. Here's some advice that I think is worth passing along.
1. Be direct. Don't delay the message or sugar coat the situation. Employees at St. Tammany Parish Hospital in Covington, LA, know when senior leaders are "beating around the bush," says President and CEO Patti Ellish. "Straightforward conversations with sensitivity to the subject matter are the best approach." These messages should be simply and clearly stated in the first sentence, adds Daisy Wademan Dowling, in this Harvard Business Reviewblog entry.
2. Be honest. Explain why the decision was made. For board and medical staff discussions concerning quality or equipment purchases, leaders should have a plan that describes how the management team is working to resolve the issues and when improvements or equipment purchases can be expected, Peeples says.
3. Be prepared. Senior executives should heed the Scout motto. It's been around for 100 years and for good reason. Anticipating all of the potential reactions to the news and what questions people may ask will help leaders be consistent in their message and provide relevant information.
4. Remain calm. It's important for leaders to exert calmness, says John Baldoni in this blog entry on how Liddy successfully delivered an unpopular message in front of an unfriendly crowd. "If a leader comes unglued, it gives opponents ammunition to attack and supporters no reason to follow," he says.
5. Apologize when appropriate. Apologies can help diffuse controversial situations. Own up to mistakes the organization made that may have contributed to the current situation. But make sure the apology is heartfelt, experts say. Otherwise it will only make matters worse.
6. Befriend the media. Having a good relationship with the media helps when delivering bad news to the community about cutting services, Peeples says. By working together, the information can be conveyed in a more positive light.
Senior leaders who flub these conversations by delaying them too long or doling out pieces of information without a clear plan on how to resolve the challenges can splinter the organization and create an environment of mistrust. Difficult conversations are an opportunity to be inclusive and bring the organization closer together.
Carrie Vaughan is leadership editor with HealthLeaders magazine. She can be reached at cvaughan@healthleadersmedia.com.
Note: You can sign up to receive HealthLeaders Media Corner Office, a free weekly e-newsletter that reports on key management trends and strategies that affect healthcare CEOs and senior leaders.
Leading and coaching staff is sometimes difficult, according to a recent blog posting by the Harvard Business Review. Marshall Goldsmith, an author of numerous books about leadership, has found that many organizations have employees that are simply "uncoachable." He says there are several ways leaders can detect the lost causes and effectively handle these staff members.
Four Pennsylvania lawmakers who represent neighborhoods near Northeastern Hospital still hope they can keep it open. They are threatening to withhold funding to Temple University Health System, which announced this week that it will close the Philadelphia hospital July 1. Temple said it would continue using the building to provide outpatient services, including prenatal care. State Rep. John Taylor, whose district includes the hospital, called the health system's decision to close the hospital "arrogant, ill-advised, and premature."