Skip to main content

Healthcare Reform Costs to Insurers May Exceed Forecasts

 |  By jsimmons@healthleadersmedia.com  
   August 13, 2010

Compliance by health insurers with the medical loss ratio provisions in the new healthcare reform law, along with other reforms included in the White House's "Patients' Bill of Rights," may cost those companies more than analysts have predicted, according to research from Weiss Ratings, which provides independent insurance company ratings.

Weiss reported that companies already complying in 2009 had average net profit margins of only 0.7%, while those not yet complying had average net margins of 6.3%—or nine times more.

Starting next year under the new healthcare reform provisions, individual and small group insurers will be required to spend at least 80%--and large group insurers to spend at least 85%--of their premium dollars on medical care and initiatives to improve the quality of care. In addition, insurers renewing on or after Sept. 23 will be required to cover provisions including no arbitrary rescissions of insurance coverage and no lifetime limits on coverage.

"As long as their investment incomes hold up, most large insurers should be able to handle the increased medical expenses expected under the new health care reform," said Martin D. Weiss, president of Weiss Ratings in a statement. "If investment income declines significantly, however, few insurers will be able to comply without debilitating impacts to their bottom line, and ultimately, their financial stability as well."

To view the impact of the reform on the industry's earnings, the Weiss study reviewed 543 health insurers--distinguishing between two groups: 226 not yet compliant companies, or those that spent less than 85% of their premiums on medical expenses in 2009; and 317 "already compliant" companies, or those that already spent 85% or more of their premiums on medical expenses in 2009.

Weiss found that "already compliant" companies including income from both their insurance underwriting operations and from their investments earned a total of $1.74 billion—or an average of $5.5 million each. In contrast, the "not yet compliant" companies earned far more—7.68 billion, or an average of $34 million each.

With underwriting income, the difference between premiums collected and medical claims paid showed sharp differences. Thus as a group, the "already compliant" companies lost $372 million on their insurance operations, with an average underwriting margin of a negative 0.2%; the "not yet compliant" companies earned $6.11 billion with an average underwriting margin of 5%.

The overall size of the insurer was also a factor since larger companies tended to have more investment income--making it possible for them to anticipate higher medical expenses per premium dollar. However, the contrast between the two groups remained great even without the size differences, according to the report.

Janice Simmons is a senior editor and Washington, DC, correspondent for HealthLeaders Media Online. She can be reached at jsimmons@healthleadersmedia.com.

Tagged Under:


Get the latest on healthcare leadership in your inbox.