MRSA Progress Brings Hope for Hospitals’ Ability to Adapt

Philip Betbeze, August 13, 2010

No shortage of commentators like myself are predicting that the business of healthcare is about to get a lot more cutthroat. To hear some of them tell it, the unceasing double-digit inflation that has plagued healthcare for years will eventually lead to a race to the bottom, whereby only the most hardy and lean organizations will survive, putting everyone's healthcare at risk.

That doomsday scenario is indeed a possibility as we look far into the future of healthcare delivery. In fact, it's a widespread belief that many hospitals and health systems won't be able to make their necessary margins on essentially Medicare rates of reimbursement as healthcare reform takes hold, and they will close. I got more than a couple of emails from readers on my recent column about standalone hospitals, where I suggested few will actually close in the coming years. My correspondents vehemently disagreed, in effect saying, this time it's different.

Maybe it is different this time. That there is waste in the system, there can be no doubt. That we can't afford such steep annual hikes in healthcare costs is unquestioned. That we can't afford to continue to treat people in an uncoordinated fashion makes perfect sense. But in the race to get to that point, will so many hospitals get it wrong enough to actually cease operations? Is it really that bleak?

I don't think so, and here's one reason why. When faced with an ultimatum, hospital leadership, as leadership in any other business does, responds. Let's look at a big win this week in a story written by my colleague Cheryl Clark. In it, she discusses a study conducted by the Journal of the American Medical Association that shows hospitals have made huge strides against hospital-acquired infections caused by hospital-onset methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, better known as MRSA.

MRSA is the scourge of hospital ORs around the country. Contracting it results in an often-crippling infection, usually on vulnerable people who have undergone an unrelated surgical procedure. And preventing its transmission is deceptively simple. Deceptive, because all it takes to prevent most cases is proper sterilization of equipment, and importantly, the hands of the people performing the procedure.

Philip Betbeze

Philip Betbeze is the senior leadership editor at HealthLeaders Media.

Facebook icon
LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon