Skip to main content


GAO Concerned About Misuse of Re-enrollment Flexibility

By Gregory A. Freeman  
   April 16, 2018

Consumers may be abusing an ACA provision that allows them to re-enroll after their coverage was terminated for nonpayment, a government report says. The practice may undermine the stability of the healthcare insurance exchange.

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) normally allows people to enroll only during open enrollment periods each year, but exceptions are made for consumers who lost their employer coverage or experienced other certain setbacks.

But the Government Accountability Office (GAO) says people may be unfairly taking advantage of the rule and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) should collect better data to determine the extent of the abuse.

A GAO report released to the public on April 9 says insurers have expressed concern that some people are misusing the ACA rules by reenrolling after their coverage was terminated for nonpayment of premiums. The law prohibits enrollees from signing up under a special enrollment period citing loss of coverage if the coverage was lost due to nonpayment of premiums.

The GAO's investigation determined that about half (53%) of the 2015 federally facilitated exchange (FFE) enrollees maintained continuous health insurance coverage throughout the year, beginning coverage between January 1 and March 1, 2015, and maintaining it through December 31, 2015. They had an average of 11.6 months of coverage.

The remaining 47% started their coverage later or ended it during the year, averaging five months of coverage.

Enrollees could have voluntarily ended coverage or they could have had it terminated by CMS or the issuers of coverage for valid reasons, including losing eligibility for exchange coverage or for nonpayment of premiums.

CMS does not have reliable data on terminations of coverage for enrollees' nonpayment of premiums, the report notes.

"Officials told us they do not track these data because they are not critical to ensure the accuracy of the federal subsidy amounts—which is the main function of the monthly reconciliation process," the report says.

"Further, CMS lacks a transparent process to ensure the accuracy of these data, as the monthly reconciliation files transmitted between CMS and issuers do not include a place to capture data on termination reasons."

Gregory A. Freeman is a contributing writer for HealthLeaders.

Get the latest on healthcare leadership in your inbox.