Participants in Medicare's ACO program are not willing to take on the risk of losing money. A recent survey found most will quit the program altogether instead.
Requiring risk-based contracts will force accountable care organizations (ACOs) to decide whether the potential upside is worth the possibility of losing significant revenue if they miss quality targets, and the answer for many will be no, according to a recent survey.
Upside risk was acceptable, but taking on the downside risk is a deal breaker for almost two-thirds of the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) Track 1 ACOs surveyed by the National Association of ACOs (NAACOS).
The group surveyed Track 1 ACOs entering their third agreement periods in 2019, specifically targeting the 82 ACOs that began the MSSP in 2012 or 2013 and remain in Track 1 in 2018. They are required to move to a two-sided ACO model in their third agreement period beginning in 2019.
These were some of the findings:
- When asked how likely their ACOs were to leave the MSSP as a result of having to assume risk, 71.4% said they were likely to leave, 22.9% said they were not at all likely, and 5.7% said they were unsure.
- When asked what they view as their top challenges or barriers to assuming risk, the top concerns were the amount of risk being too great, unpredictable changes to the ACO model and CMS rules, and a desire for more reliable financial projections. Those were cited by just 39.4% of ACOs.
- Another top challenge, selected by 36% of respondents, was "concerns about past performance."
- The survey also asked ACOs if they were given an opportunity to continue in Track 1 for a third agreement period, how likely would they be to continue participating in Track 1. Seventy-six percent of respondents said they would be "completely likely" or "very likely."
Gregory A. Freeman is a contributing writer for HealthLeaders.