In a way, Dallas's Parkland Hospital is running out of time. But it doesn't have to be that way. Its day of reckoning is coming now that the hospital's leadership won approval from its board of managers to ask the county commission to allow a bond election this fall. The election, which commissioners are expected to approve, will ask Dallas County voters to tax themselves to the tune of up to $747 million—60% of the estimated cost of building a $1.3 billion replacement hospital.
Yikes. Good luck with that.
Despite voters' usual disinterest in raising their own taxes, however, this particular measure would likely be a good investment. In many ways, Parkland is a model of best practices in how to run a public hospital in an admittedly thin—and rapidly thinning—field of compatriots. It was the first Level I trauma center in north Texas. It's the second-largest regional burn center and the busiest maternity hospital in the U.S. And it provided $409 million in uncompensated care in the past fiscal year and logs about 140,000 ED visits each year.
And here's the important thing for voters: Parkland makes a margin—at least on operations. Operating revenues increased 14.2% from 2004 to 2005 and 18.7% from 2005 to 2006, while operating expenses increased 8.1% from 2004 to 2005 and 5.1% from 2005 to 2006. Despite its huge uncompensated care load, the hospital takes its finances seriously. After discovering that hundreds—if not thousands—of well-off patients living outside Dallas County were pleading poverty (and fraudulently claiming county residence) to take advantage of the hospital's generous charity care policy, Parkland went after them aggressively in the courts and won judgments more often than not.
That's remarkable compared with Parkland's brethren. Public hospitals are closing at a far faster rate than hospitals in general because running a public hospital without losing millions each year is darn hard. Some might argue with me, but as a group, they are generally less well-managed than other hospitals for a lot of reasons—chief among them being political interference. Because of their charitable mission, they are dependent on philanthropy and tax revenue for their support. And they can't simply pack up and move to the suburbs where the paying patients are to supplement their bottom line. Many of them are used as jobs programs by local politicians who often also are heavily involved in the hospital's governance. That's what makes Parkland a shining example of what's right with the model.
But the current Parkland is old and decrepit.
Its longtime CEO, Ronald Anderson, MD, has run the hospital since 1982, when he was named CEO at age 35. Still, the hospital he works in is almost as old as he is. Built in 1954, the 862-bed hospital is serving twice as many patients each year as it was designed for.
The hospital is already gearing up the likely bond referendum PR effort on its Web site. In the "who we are" section, the story is headed by the phrase, "we live in a house that yesterday built." It's a tribute to those of the past who built the institution but also a subtle hint that the hospital is too run-down, too small, and too old. Still, convincing taxpayers—many of whom feel they are already overtaxed—to add to their burden is a monumental undertaking.
But look at it this way, Dallas voters. The new Parkland's price tag is only a couple hundred thousand more than the new Cowboys stadium going up in nearby Arlington, which, by the way, is kicking in $325 million of tax money for that gleaming monument to excess. Despite all that, the team is still going to be called the Dallas Cowboys. So Arlington's paying the freight on your football team. That Jerry Jones must be a heckuva salesman.
Maybe Ronald Anderson should give him a call.
Philip Betbeze is finance editor with HealthLeaders magazine. He can be reached at pbetbeze@healthleadersmedia.com.
Note: You can sign up to receive HealthLeaders Media Finance, a free weekly e-newsletter that reports on the top quality issues facing healthcare leaders.
A new high-tech imaging center is opening in Southdale Medical Center in Edina, MN. Called Suburban Imaging, the joint venture involves two large radiology groups, the state’s third-largest hospital and clinic group, Fairview Health Services; and 21 physician groups in the area. Its opening is likely to reignite a debate on whether Minnesota has too many diagnostic imaging facilities and encourages doctors to order unnecessary procedures and pushing up medical costs. It’s also likely to raise the question of whether doctors should refer patients to a facility in which they have a financial stake.
Prince George's County in Maryland is considering converting empty stores in old shopping centers, even entire malls, into medical facilities. County officials are reviewing a feasibility study that recommends creating "medical malls" in four underutilized shopping centers in neglected communities. Under the plan, the county would partner with private retail owners to renovate or build spaces where customers could, for example, shop for clothes in one end of the mall and get a mammogram or a physical in another. The partnership would be paid for with public and private dollars.
As pressure builds for Grady Memorial Hospital CEO Pam Stephenson to answer questions regarding her law degree, efforts are under way to oust her as chairwoman of the Atlanta hospital's authority board. Some state and local officials have criticized Stephenson for the multiple hats she's donned in Grady management, saying they represent conflicts of interest. The latest controversy over her law degree is adding momentum to efforts to remove her as the Grady authority chairwoman. The 10-member board will soon meet to elect its officers. While it remains unclear whether there are enough votes to oust her as chairwoman, some authority members say Stephenson's controversies have become a distraction from overseeing the business of Grady.
Hospital-acquired infections are claiming more American lives each year than AIDS, breast cancer, or automobile accidents. The right physical environment, including single-patient rooms; well-designed ventilation systems and air filters; easy-to-clean, nonporous surface materials; and plenty of sinks for washing hands; could reduce the spread of infection, architects say. They even have research supporting the concept, and now hospitals across the country are using this information to reduce infections from the ground up.
Due to a bureaucratic tangle, 1,000 cancer patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering's new center in Basking Ridge, NJ, may be forced to find new doctors. The cancer center recently sent letters to patients covered by Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey telling them they will be charged out-of-network prices after Sept. 1. The patients can avoid the higher charges by switching their care to Sloan Kettering's Manhattan hospital, the letter said.