Voters this week approved a minimum wage hike in four states, funding for a safety net hospital in Arizona, and the so-called "any-willing provider requirement" initiative in South Dakota.
Minimum wage workers in four states will be able to celebrate the New Year with a slightly higher salary—and their employers, including hospitals and healthcare systems, will have to find a way to tighten their belts a bit.
While Tuesday's election results shifted political power in the U.S. Senate to the GOP, voters in Alaska, Arkansas, Nebraska, and South Dakota empowered low-wage earners to receive minimum wage increases (Illinois had a non-binding minimum wage question on its ballot.)
Minimum wage workers often include healthcare support occupations, personal care and service employees, cafeteria workers, administrative support roles and other jobs that can be found in any large hospital.
Population Health and Wealth "We think having a living wage is tied to everyone's health and well-being," says Liz Jacobs, RN, a spokesperson for National Nurses United. "[Our organization has] long endorsed and worked for a living wage for everyone. We're very concerned about inequality—and it's only getting worse."
A wage hike for healthcare workers—has direct effects on the health of a population, says Jacobs. It affects their ability to purchase medical coverage, to eat healthy foods and afford copays. Additionally, from a management standpoint, paying employees more can lead to higher levels of employee engagement—which can lead to better patient engagement and higher HCAHPS scores.
"I think this will contribute to employees themselves having a better quality of life, and that in turn could improve their morale in their workplace. I've spoken to low-wage workers in hospitals that have health insurance, but have chronic health conditions that they can't get treated because they can't afford the co-pays."
While concerns over layoffs, hiring freezes, and other effects of raising personnel costs are frequently cited by those opposed to an increased minimum wage, Jacobs remains unconcerned and resolute. "The recent elections show the tremendous public support for raising the minimum wage in cities across the country, so I imagine hospitals might try to find another excuse if they want to do hiring freezes or layoffs."
Wanted: Higher Wages Other labor organizations echo Jacobs' sentiments.
"In deeply conservative states like Nebraska and South Dakota, the economy isn't working for working people and the message from voters was clear: we've got to increase wages," says Mary Kay Henry, president of the SEIU, which represents over 1.2 million healthcare workers, in a statement issued by her office.
Healthcare leadership is still weighing the impact of these new laws, but it does not appear to be a big issue in Alaska. "To date, [the minimum wage increase] has not risen as a significant issue in Alaskan hospitals," says Becky Hultberg, president and CEO at the Alaska State Hospital and Nursing Home Association, where minimum wage will raise from $7.75 per hour to $8.75 per hour on January 1—and then to $9.75 per hour the following year.
State hospital association leadership in Nebraska and Illinois declined to comment on this story; The South Dakota State Hospital Association and the Arkansas Hospital Association were unavailable.
AZ Voters Back $935M for Safety Net Health
By an almost two-to-one margin voters in Maricopa County Arizona approved a $935 million bond issue Tuesday to pay for significant upgrades to the Maricopa Integrated Health System.
MIHS President/CEO Steve Purves says 63% of the voters backed Prop. 480 because they "understand and appreciate the vital mission we have as a safety net system of care."
"We take care of the vulnerable. We also have the second-largest burn center as part of our organization. We do things that nobody else does," Purves says.
"We have a vital and very important teaching mission. We are the second-largest provider of medical residency programs in the state. In fact, we are the state's first sanctioned teaching hospital by American Medical Association back in 1954. People understood that every major metropolitan area and vibrant community needs a healthy public healthcare system. Those things resonated with the voters."
Maricopa voters were not necessarily in a giving mood on Tuesday. For example, 66% of them voted against Prop. 304 to raise state legislators' annual salaries from $24,000 to $35,000.
Purves says the MIHS took great pains to explain to the public what the Prop. 480 money would be used for, and how much the bond would cost for each taxpayer "down to the penny" over its 27-year assessment.
"That way they can put that into context," he says. "For example, for somebody who owns a $100,000 home that would increase their property taxes by $13.74 a year. When you break that down on a monthly basis you begin to see what it costs and what you get. That value proposition in our case resonated overwhelming with our community."
With the new funding, $570 million will be used to upgrade acute-care facilities, including a new Maricopa Medical Center, $225 million will fund new behavioral health facilities, and $138 million will target outpatient facility construction and upgrades, Purves says.
Engaging the public is critical for safety net hospitals and should be part of the job description for senior leadership and oversight boards, he adds.
"Especially hospitals that rely on public tax support have an obligation to communicate regularly and strongly with the community what they are doing with the resources they have been entrusted with," Purves says.
"That is what we have done. If people don't know what you are doing, if they don't know your relevancy, then why would they ever support an increase in their taxes to support your mission if they don't know what your mission is?"
SD Voters OK Network Expansion
In South Dakota, voters passed Initiated Measure 17, which had pitted providers against payers. The measure permits any healthcare provider to join an insurance company's network, as long as the provider agrees to the company's terms and conditions, and works within the company's coverage area.
IM 17, also known as the "any-willing provider requirement" was opposed by insurers, such as Sanford Health Plan, on grounds that it would cause healthcare costs to rise.
Kevin Counihan knows he has a lot at stake this month. As chief executive of HealthCare.gov, Mr. Counihan is responsible for making sure the site doesn't falter during the second year of insurance sign-ups under the Affordable Care Act. Its disastrous launch last year embarrassed the Obama administration and frustrated millions who visited the portal to buy health plans. Much is riding on this enrollment season, which begins Nov. 15. Polls show most Americans hold an unfavorable view of the law despite the fact that millions gained benefits from it this year. HealthCare.gov may have to withstand almost twice as many users as last year. And back-end parts of the site still remain unbuilt, though they aren't immediately crucial for consumers. [Subscription Required]
No additional Ebola cases have been diagnosed in Texas in connection with a small outbreak earlier this fall, state health officials announced Thursday. The Texas Department of State Health Services touted the good news as the last person being monitored approached the end of the Ebola virus's 21-day incubation period. That person was not identified by name, but the health department said he or she was a hospital worker who handled potentially hazardous medical waste on Oct. 17. A total of 177 people were monitored due to contact with one of the state's three Ebola patients: Thomas Eric Duncan, a Liberian man who died of the disease; and nurses Nina Pham and Amber Vinson, who treated Duncan and have recovered.
The kids are asleep, and I've settled into a comfy armchair in the corner of my New England living room, one of my favorite spots for shopping online. I've got my laptop open and I'm ready to search for a bone density test. Hmmm … looks like the price that my insurer pays for that test varies from $190 at Harvard Vanguard to $445 at Brigham and Women's Hospital. Really? I'm calm, but this is a seismic moment. In most of the country, it is still nearly impossible to compare the price and quality of anything in health care. Ten years ago, I tried filing Freedom of Information Act requests to get this information and got nothing. Occasionally, sources would leak me spread sheets from one hospital or another.
As the flu season gets underway over the next few weeks, public health officials have been preparing for a unique set of challenges. Some people are still looking for a last-minute flu shot due to delays in immunization shipments from two manufacturers, and those experiencing fever, aches, and fatigue from the flu may be more likely to head to the emergency room this year due to concerns about the Ebola virus, which causes similar symptoms. "I'm speculating, but there's no doubt in my mind that more people will be hitting the emergency departments this flu season suspecting that they or someone close to them has Ebola," said Dr. Eugene Litvak, president and CEO of the Boston-based non-profit Institute for Healthcare Optimization.
Six former administrators for WellCare Health Plans say they were fired in late 2012 for resisting corporate pressure to deny paying for legitimate hospital stays, according to a recently unsealed federal lawsuit. The civil lawsuit was filed in May 2013 but was unsealed last week after the federal government declined to join the case. That means the fired administrators are on their own, should the case proceed. WellCare is a major contractor for Florida's Medicaid and Medicare patients enrolled in managed care plans, and one of the Tampa Bay area's largest public companies. It has been trying to move beyond a well-publicized federal fraud investigation that ignited in 2007 with an FBI raid of its headquarters.