This article was originally published by Sg2 on March 15.
As we watch accountable care organization (ACO) fever rise—spiking again after the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced it will be releasing a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking—academic medical centers (AMCs) are left wondering what their role will be in a coming “ACO era.” Healthcare innovation zones (HIZs) have gotten significantly less media attention than ACOs, but present a compelling model for AMCs to consider. HIZs are 1 of 20 pilot projects that will be managed by the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation (CMI). HIZs are fundamentally ACOs with AMCs at their heart, combining the unique advanced care expertise, data research capabilities and physician training competencies of academic hospitals in partnerships with nonacademic organizations, including community providers and public and private payers.
House of Representatives Bill
Specifics about HIZs are sparse in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), and CMS has not yet released additional details. However, a House bill proposed in 2009 by US Representative Allyson Schwartz (D-PA) and developed with input from the Association of American Medical Colleges served as a template for HIZ language and provides hints as to how HIZs may be implemented. In the bill, an HIZ is defined as a partnership arrangement in which an AMC leads and coordinates care with other hospitals, primary care providers, outpatient care, recovery and rehabilitation facilities, public health, community services, and Medicare and private payers. In addition, the bill dictated that HIZs must:
Identify a specific geographical zone and estimate the size of the patient population that could be cared for within the HIZ.
Coordinate a group of clinical entities capable of providing inpatient, outpatient, post-acute and preventive care.
Engage community and clinical care leaders in designing the HIZ plan.
Leverage information technology (IT) to coordinate care across facilities and geography.
Collect and report quality data to continuously maintain or improve the quality of care.
Provide comprehensive services to at least 50% of the population in the HIZ.
Collect and submit data on changes to medical education that reflect changes in how health care is delivered.
As of the writing of this post, it is unclear how (and if) HIZ pilot projects will be funded. The CMI has $10 billion to use at its discretion for the plethora of pilots proposed in the PPACA and may use it to provide seed funding for HIZ projects. However, the CMI is currently juggling many responsibilities with a small staff and partisan wrangling over defunding health care reform continues. Although the fate of HIZs is uncertain, they share much in common with ACOs, which continue to pick up momentum. While successful ACOs will require a strong foundation of primary care, most AMCs have emphasized tertiary and quaternary care. Future ACOs (and HIZs) will likely give AMCs the role of a “center of excellence” for patients who require specialty care beyond the scope of what community ACOs can provide. Thus, AMCs could have multiple contracts with different ACOs that refer to the AMC for tertiary and quaternary care. A surefire strategy for AMCs in the short- to mid-term includes the following actions:
Strengthen core competencies as “centers of excellence.” Take a disease-based approach to determine in which service lines, procedures or specialties your AMC excels—not every AMC can be a center of excellence in everything! Invest in these areas for sophisticated, high-margin care and strengthen the referral networks that bring in patients for these services.
Learn to partner with primary care providers and post-acute care providers. AMCs should establish a coordinated, collaborative approach to transitioning patients between sites of care. Tools to improve coordination include:
A service culture in which both the patient and the referring physician are seen as high-value clients of the AMC.
An electronic medical record that interfaces with both the primary care office and the AMC.
Nurse navigators and patient coordinators who facilitate communication between sites of care, providers and patients.
Clear guidelines for primary care and community sites on how to perform tests such as biopsies, imaging studies and other first-line treatments prior to transferring patients to the AMC. Primary care/community health sites and AMCs should develop these guidelines together.
Clear referral pathways specifying to which provider the patient will be referred.
Clear guidelines for post-acute care and effective communication regarding patients’ care plans.
Anticipate major organizational and cultural changes needed for AMCs to become ACOs or HIZs. Faculty practices that are unified with university hospitals and clinics will be in a better position to coordinate care and avoid interdepartmental conflict than organizations with fragmented leadership. AMCs will have to negotiate alignment strategies that balance the needs and goals of faculty, nonfaculty employed physicians and independent physicians aligned with the AMC network. Meaningful clinical quality incentives (financial and nonfinancial) will have to be developed for faculty, whose current incentives heavily favor research and grants.
AMCs Making ACO News
AMC interest in ACOs and HIZs varies considerably by organization. A few AMCs are aggressively pursuing ACO and ACO-like networks, while many are adapting a wait-and-see approach and others are sitting firmly on the sidelines. Interest, however, has picked up significantly in the last few months. Two examples include:
Montefiore Medical Center, the university hospital for the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, is actively positioning itself to become an ACO. Montefiore’s 4-hospital system has maintained positive operating margins despite the fact that 80% of its volume comes from Medicare and Medicaid patients. It has done this by building an integrated system that includes 21 primary care clinics, multiple physician-led quality improvement initiatives and a health IT system that tracks patient data across the care continuum. This integration has allowed Montefiore to efficiently deliver care to 150,000 enrollees in capitated contracts from both government and private payers, laying the groundwork for eventual transformation into an ACO.
Johns Hopkins Medicine’s plan to develop an ACO places it in a unique position because it already has an insurance plan, affiliated primary care groups, community hospitals and 2 recently acquired regional hospital centers. In addition, Johns Hopkins has been participating in innovative payment models, such as PACE (Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly), a capitated program that provides outpatient senior care. Hopkins also has created a virtual, multidisciplinary Center for Innovative Medicine to promote patient-centered approaches to care delivery.
In planning for the long-term, AMCs should partner with (but not necessarily acquire) primary care providers and begin piloting care delivery models, payment models (eg, bundled payment) and care coordination strategies. Taking a data-driven approach to pilots is a helpful way to incrementally redesign care. Ultimately, metrics will make AMC partnerships more accountable for the care of patients in the community. AMCs should focus on areas such as hip replacements, cardiac surgery and high-risk obstetrics, in which the AMC has the means and opportunity to decrease utilization of expensive services. Regardless of the partnerships that emerge, a strong System of CARE (Clinical Alignment and Resource Effectiveness) provides the best foundation for any 3-letter acronym of the future.
Sources: Berkowitz SA and Miller ED. Accountable care at academic medical centers—lessons from Johns Hopkins. N Engl J Med 2011;364:e12(1)–e12(3) [Epublication ahead of print]; Kastor JA. Accountable care organizations at academic medical centers. N Engl J Med 2011;364:e11(1)–e11(3) [Epublication ahead of print]; Sg2 Interview With Montefiore Care Management Organization, February 2011; Chase D. Montefiore Medical Center Case Study. The Commonwealth Fund: October 2010; HR 3664: Healthcare Innovation Zone Pilot Act of 2009.
The House Republican plan for overhauling Medicare would fundamentally change how the federal government pays for healthcare, starting a decade from now, likely resulting in higher out-of-pocket costs and greater limits to coverage for many Americans. The current spending level on seniors in Medicare is widely viewed as unsustainable, given rising medical costs and the aging population. Medicare calculates that it spent an average of $11,743 on beneficiaries in 2009, according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan's solution is to end the current Medicare program for people born in 1957 and after. Starting in 2022, when those Americans begin turning 65, they would no longer get their medical bills paid directly by the government, which the Wisconsin Republican in his blueprint released Tuesday calls an unsustainable "blank check commitment." Instead, those age 65 would be entitled to $8,000 a year on average in 2022, according to an estimate by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The amount would increase as the enrollee aged and with the rise in the Consumer Price Index.
Of all the complaints that have been made about the new federal healthcare law, the angriest have been against the law's "individual mandate," which requires everyone who can afford health insurance to purchase it or pay a fine. Starting in 2014, people who fail to buy in will be charged a tax penalty that will start at $95 a year and ratchet up to 1% of annual income for the more affluent. The fine will rise to at least $695, with a ceiling of 2.5% of income, by 2016. The mandate is a target not only of public resentment and political rancor but of myriad lawsuits and state legislation aimed at disabling it. Six states already have made it illegal to penalize a person for failing to get health coverage, and more are expected to follow suit; Republicans in Congress are trying to throw out the provision altogether. But many believe that in the absence of a mandate, the entire law could unravel.
The U.S. Senate voted 87-12 Tuesday to repeal the much-criticized law dramatically expanding the volume of 1099 forms that businesses have to send their customers. Approved earlier by the House, the bill goes to President Obama, who has indicated he will sign it even though it amounts to a big cut in the subsidies of his 2010 healthcare overhaul. The move is a victory for business interests, who had said the expansion intended to help pay for last year's healthcare reform law was too burdensome and costly. Significantly, the bill also repeals a less controversial expansion, contained in last September's Small Business Jobs Act, that expanded the 1099 reporting of taxpayers who own rental properties but aren't real estate professionals.
Steward Health Care System on Tuesday unveiled its second deal in four days to buy a Massachusetts community hospital, saying it had signed a letter of intent to purchase Saints Medical Center in Lowell and convert it to a for-profit institution. But before the ink was dry, the president of a group representing about 40 primary care doctors and 160 specialists affiliated with Saints said he opposed the alliance with Steward. And the chief executive of rival Lowell General Hospital, which lost out in the bidding for Saints, said he would challenge the deal as state regulators review the proposed sale. The dissenting voices represent the toughest potential roadblock so far to the hospital network Steward has been assembling across eastern Massachusetts. Steward, based in Boston, was created by New York private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management to manage the six Caritas Christi Health Care Catholic hospitals it bought last year.
The Managed Care Executive Group, a national organization of U.S. senior health plan executives, met last week in Arizona to discuss the top issues that health plans face in 2011. The 22nd Annual Forum, lead by industry thought leaders such as David Brailer, MD, Thomas Main, Karen Bell, MD, Jeff Margolis and 14 other invited healthcare experts, focused heavily on the forward progression of healthcare retail, enabling innovation and technology, payment reform, and the rising role of consumers via social media and individual markets including Medicaid and Medicare. Each year The Managed Care Executive Group polls health plan executives and industry thought leaders across the country via surveys, webinars and other events to compile a list of issues impacting health insurance organizations. At their yearly forum the executives voted their "Top 10" issues.