Since launching in 2004, the Certification Commission for Health Information Technology has become the de facto stamp of approval for EHRs, helping providers judge EHR product suitability, quality, interoperability, and security. For about $28,000, a vendor who meets the Commission's criteria can be certified, automatically proving to providers that their EHR is worth the money, say CCHIT proponents. Now, CCHIT is expanding its scope of certification, and not everyone is happy about CCHIT's increasing influence in the market.
The expansion includes two areas already named in previous years—behavioral health and long-term care—that will be developed as planned. In addition, four new program areas are proposed, all of which are optional add-on certifications for ambulatory EHRs: clinical research, dermatology, advanced interoperability, and advanced quality.
One of the main components being added to CCHIT's lineup will be increased flexibility and opening up the option of certifying advanced levels of technology for products that go "beyond the basics" in any domain, says Mark Leavitt, MD, chair of CCHIT.
"There is now a degree of sophistication with the technology and a readiness on the part of the end users that we need to have different levels of certification. You will still have the certification for ambulatory EHR, but those with advanced decision support, for example, would get additional certification that says this product also offers advanced decision support so if that's something you are ready for and looking for, this has it," says Leavitt.
He says the group chose the expansion areas based on a model that quantified the benefit of certification by looking at how many patients are affected by the specialty, how many dollars are spent in the specialty, the readiness of the specialty (for example, have providers gotten together and formed committees to define what they need or would CCHIT have to start from scratch) and then, "we balanced those out. We ultimately came out with a prioritization, and published that January 14 open for comment. We are accepting comment through February 5," says Leavitt. CCHIT also is considering eventual certification programs for software to support eye care, oncology, obstetrics/gynecology, advanced security, and advanced clinical decision support.
Just how much CCHIT certification should influence the decision about which EHR system to buy has become a point of contention for detractors who say smaller vendors are getting pushed out by the cost of getting certified ($23,200 for the initial review and $4,800 in annual maintenance fees over the three-year certification), giving vendors with capital to spare an unfair advantage. In addition, critics maintain that CCHIT certification will lead to higher prices for EHRs because vendors will be forced to pass the cost of certification on to providers and competition will be limited by narrowing the number of competitive software vendors.
"The people who are subsidizing EMRs or reimbursing providers are looking to drive them toward automation in their offices, and therefore financial incentives or the requirements that those organizations put on physicians are increasingly going to favor CCHIT-certified EMRs because it's easier to take a quick swipe at the market and lop off anything that isn't CCHIT certified," says Don Fornes, CEO of Software Advice, a consulting firm that offers advice to organizations looking to buy new software. "If you know that a CCHIT-certified EMR is absolutely going to give you a certain set of functionality and interoperability that you need, that's extremely useful."
For me, the whole "controversy" seems pretty cut and dry. At a time when very few people have money to spare, deciding to make an investment of this magnitude cannot be taken lightly. And I, as a tried and true consumer, would most certainly be looking for system that has all the stamps of approval. CCHIT is a private, nonprofit initiative whose stated mission is to "accelerate the adoption of robust, interoperable health information technology by creating a credible, efficient certification process." It's not as if the group is looking to make millions by fleecing small vendors through the certification process. Not only that, but all of the new EHR legislation being drafted at the federal level includes money to help stimulate the adoption of EHRs and all of that legislation requires that the EHRs be CCHIT certified, according to Leavitt.
As Gregory Spencer, MD, an internist and CMIO at Crystal Run Healthcare in Wallkill, NY, told me, "It's unbelievably helpful to have third party out there kicking the tires for you. People in the market need a product that they know matches what vendor tells them the capabilities are. We have that assurance. We know we are going to get a certain amount of capability if the vendor has been certified," he says. With three-quarters of the EHR market represented by vendors who have CCHIT certified products, it's looking like those vendors who don't want to or can't pay to get certified are going to have two choices: take a major hit in sales or be swallowed up by a bigger, CCHIT certified company.
Kathryn Mackenzie is technology editor of HealthLeaders magazine. She can be reached at kmackenzie@healthleadersmedia.com.
Note: You can sign up to receive HealthLeaders Media IT, a free weekly e-newsletter that features news, commentary and trends about healthcare technology.
Hospitals with automated notes and records, order entry, and clinical decision support had fewer complications, lower mortality rates, and lower costs, according to a study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine. Researchers conducted a cross-sectional study of urban hospitals in Texas using the Clinical Information Technology Assessment Tool, which measures a hospital's level of automation based on physician interactions with the information system. After adjustment for potential confounders, they examined whether greater automation of hospital information was associated with reduced rates of inpatient mortality, complications, costs, and length of stay.
The 62nd annual Society of Surgical Oncology Cancer Symposium is scheduled for March 4-8, 2009, in Phoenix. The program is intended for all surgeons who are involved in the treatment of patients with cancer, according to the Society's Web site.
There will be a weekend conference exclusively on Free Open Source Software scheduled for July 31, 2009 through Sunday, August 2, 2009, in Houston. The conference will be the first U.S.-based conference focused solely on healthcare FOSS since OSCHA in 2002, according to this posting on the HIT Transition Weblog.
The Health and Human Services Department has formally recognized three new interoperability specifications related to electronic health records, personal health records, and electronic quality monitoring. Formal recognition is part of a two-step process in which specifications are first accepted by the HHS secretary and then recognized a year later. The recognition process "is critical to advancing both federal and private sector use of health IT standards," according to HHS representatives. The official recognition was noted Jan. 21 in the Federal Register.
David Title, a 35-year-old new-media manager at a film production company in New York, has dropped his cable subscription and moved to watching most of his television online . While shopping for a new laptop for his girlfriend recently, he picked a bare-bones, $200 Asus EeePC laptop. Silicon Valley has been gripped by a growing sense that the economic retreat might do more than depress earnings, but the fear now is that consumers like Title, and businesses operating with the same cost-cutting mind-set, will erode the high-margin businesses of the information technology industry—slowing some technologies and companies but giving new momentum to others.