Pomerado Hospital in California is testing out a new system in which patients and doctors communicate even when they're not in the same. The virtual visit technology is expected to help doctors provide better care and enhance patients' quality hospital experience.
The year-old Sharklet organization has developed an anti-microbial surface on shark skin that they believe could help prevent hospital-acquired infections. The new surface disrupts microbes' ability to reproduce and form bacterial films, and can prevent bacterial growth for up to 21 days.
Hospital-acquired infection was once viewed as an unavoidable risk. Now, it has been determined that nearly all hospital infections are avoidable when physicians and staff practice proper hygiene measures. Many say this has prompted a new wave of class-action lawsuits.
A growing number of Minnesota doctors are trying to reassert their independence by breaking away from the larger groups and starting their own practices. Some of these physicians are offering "concierge care," where a limited number of patients pay a membership fee for 24-hour access to a physician. These experiments speak to a hankering for the personal relationship that is sometimes lost between doctor and patient, according to this article in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune.
In 2007, 56% of American adults sought information about a personal health concern, up from 38% in 2001, according to a study by the Center for Studying Health System Change. Use of all information sources rose substantially, with Internet information seeking doubling to 32% during the six-year period. Consumers across all categories of age, education, income, race/ethnicity and health status increased their information seeking significantly, but education level remained the key factor in explaining how likely people are to seek health information, according to the study.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has announced that all physician groups participating in the Physician Group Practice Demonstration improved the quality of care delivered to patients with congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, and diabetes mellitus during performance year two of the demonstration.
The 10 groups earned $16.7 million in incentive payments under the demonstration that rewards healthcare providers for improving health outcomes and coordinating the overall healthcare needs of Medicare patients assigned to the groups, according to a CMS release.
It is crucial to know the characteristics of your practice's service area. Start by asking basic questions about the service area, including the following:
Is the population growing or declining?
What trends are you seeing with respect to the average age, sex, household income, race/ethnicity mix, education levels, and length of residence?
Describe the work force: Is there a predominant employer?
What is the mix of retail, manufacturing, governmental, and service occupations?
What potential effect will environmental factors have on the community's physical and mental health?
Who are your competitors? How many similar physician practices serve the same population?
What is the distribution of primary care versus specialty care physicians in the service area?
Do consumers out-migrate from the service area for specialty care, and if so, why?
How do consumers/patients differentiate physician care delivered at your medical practice from what is offered at competitor practices?
What attributes do they value that can be leveraged to build awareness, preference, and, ultimately, utilization of your group's service offerings?
How do consumers perceive the physician group?
Is there anything truly distinctive and meaningful about the group, and if so, how is this being communicated to the marketplace?
What sources do consumers rely upon to get information about physicians and the group's clinical offerings?
How do consumers make their choices about where to go for care (e.g., health plan, employer, word of mouth, etc.)?
From where does the practice draw 80% of its referred patients?
Much of this information is available through secondary market research, which refers to already existing information obtained from external sources, such as the Medical Group Management Association, the U.S. Census Bureau, and local and state medical associations. It also includes internally generated data, such as relative value units, current procedural terminology codes, and patients' ZIP codes.
Unlike hospitals, which have access to standardized inpatient market share reports, most medical groups don't have a lot of detailed information about their market share and must rely on estimates. The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey publishes physician visits by specialty every two years. However, this information is specific to regions of the country and not to local area marketplaces.
There also are proprietary outpatient modeling software packages that estimate office visits using claims-based data. These may be a better solution, depending on your needs. The important thing is to recognize trends and to know what is happening in the practice service area. Choose the method that best helps you do this.
When dealing with issues related to health, life, and death on a daily basis, it's almost impossible to avoid controversy. From abortion to assisted suicide, physicians are caught in the middle of plenty of heated moral debates.
The latest comes out of California and pits the First Amendment against anti-discrimination laws. The California Supreme Court ruled this week against physicians who refused to perform an intrauterine insemination on a lesbian because of her sexual orientation. The OB/GYN defendant claimed that her religious views prevented her from performing the procedure and argued that the First Amendment right to freedom of religion protected her from prosecution.
Not so, according to the court. The judges ruled that it was a civil rights issue, no different than if the physician had refused to treat a patient because of race or ethnicity.
Physicians have come down on both sides of the issue. While many applaud the ruling because it reinforces the notion from the Hippocratic Oath that doctors should focus on the good of the patient, some have expressed concern about government entities telling them who and what to treat.
This case was fairly clear cut—California law includes sexual orientation in its civil rights protections. But there is a lot of gray area at the intersection of religion and medicine. What if a physician refuses to provide emergency contraceptives because of religious beliefs? What if a doctor objects to the use of stem cells? At issue is the proper balance between a physician's individual liberty and his or her obligation to a patient (particularly when receiving government funds).
Scholars and lawmakers have grappled with that balance for years, so providing an answer right now is a bit above my pay grade. But let's shrink the scope a little and consider the dynamics of a medical group or hospital.
Leaders have to deal with similar problems of balancing individual autonomy and group accountability. Suppose you are partners with or employing a physician who refuses to perform certain procedures. Should your group give the physician the autonomy to make his or her own decisions or attempt to set a policy and intervene?
If an individual physician's decision affects overall business or leads to a damaging lawsuit, it becomes everyone's problem. In fact, the California case escalated not because of a single physician, but because the overall medical group refused to provide treatment and advised the patient to find another doctor outside the group. The court's most conservative justice said in a separate concurring opinion that an individual doctor could protect against liability by referring patients to other doctors in their practice who did not share their religious objections.
If the group had been prepared with a physician willing to treat the patient or had a policy for dealing with the issue, it might have never gone to court.
These topics are not easy to address, particularly in a close-knit practice. But they become a lot more difficult to deal with after your reputation has been tarnished or a lawsuit has been filed.
Elyas Bakhtiari is a managing editor with HealthLeaders Media. He can be reached at ebakhtiari@healthleadersmedia.com.
Note: You can sign up to receive HealthLeaders Media PhysicianLeaders, a free weekly e-newsletter that features the top physician business headlines of the week from leading news sources.
There's no better place to talk quality and innovation than the hallowed halls of Harvard University. I've spent the last three days on the Cambridge, MA, campus attending the annual Quality Colloquium, and Tuesday I listened to a session about what hospitals can learn about quality and safety from other industries.
This panel had four speakers, and all but one had experience in aviation, an industry which, like healthcare, was once plagued by safety issues and distrust from the public. The panelists shared how the industry went from one with dismal safety statistics in the 1950s—almost three quarters of its accidents were caused by human error—to one that has made safety its No. 1 priority. I'll share six key takeaways from the afternoon's discussion.
Know the mind's shortcuts. Jim Bouey, former director of safety and airworthiness for Boeing Commercial airplanes, said the airline industry recognized that the human brain works in pieces. That's why the Federal Aviation Administration requires that cockpit instruments have standard shapes and locations. For example, the landing gear control knob is always round, while the flap control knob is always square. "We try and take advantage of how the mind works and reinforce what conclusion is going to be drawn," Bouey said. "We've made sure that instruments are not interchangeable or easily confused."
Have a fail-safe. "Assume that no matter what you do, something or someone will fail," Bouey said. He pointed to examples of potential disasters in the airline industry: an oxygen tank blowing out the side of an aircraft, an engine failing, or damage from hail. All of these instances were unexpected, but because the aircraft was designed to be fail-safe, in each case, the flight was able to land safely. "You can't train your way out of a potentially catastrophic hazard," Bouey said, but by having fail-safes in place, you can make sure that even when a disaster does occur, damage is minimal.
Make the invisible visible. William Hamman, MD, MPH, who is a captain with United Airlines, a professor at Western Michigan University's College of Aviation, and a cardiovascular surgeon, explained how using simulation techniques can help bring a hospital's quality and patient safety challenges to light. He played a video of a simulation done at a hospital emergency department, where the staff was working on an infant patient who had been thrown from a vehicle while strapped in her car seat. The video showed the interaction between ED, pediatrics, and trauma staff and showed inconsistencies and process failures as the staff was tending to the patient. After the simulation was over, everyone involved gathered in a room together to watch themselves on film and talk about what they found. One major problem discovered during this exercise was the availability of a CT for emergency department patients, especially if the trauma department also needed the service for a patient. "And this, I might add, is a Baldrige Award-winning hospital," Hamman said. It is discoveries like this, Hamman said, that can help hospitals deliver better healthcare.
Work smarter, not harder. When a company's—or hospital's—executives aren't seeing the performance they desire, it's tempting for them to issue an order telling employees to work harder, said John Carroll, professor of behavior and policy sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Sloan School of Management. "Things will get better for a little while, but eventually, your good people will leave, and those who replace them aren't as good," he said. "Instead, work smarter. It may mean for a time that the organization gets worse. But you'll get through it. It will be tempting to go back to 'work harder,' but if you do, all of these nice things you've been implementing will go away." In other words, progress takes time—maybe six months, maybe two years—but improvements are worth waiting for.
Identify your organization's culture strengths, and use them to develop new ones. "It's hard to change a culture by saying, 'let's change the culture,'" Carroll said. "It's a tough way to get things done." Instead, he says, identify what culture strengths your organization has and "tilt" them. An example is the Millstone Nuclear Power Station in Waterford, CT. The station went through some tough times, and was even shut down for a period of time, Carroll said, but its leaders recognized that its culture deeply valued excellence, professional integrity, and safety. They were able to use these three cultural strengths to introduce two new ones, mutual respect and openness, he said. Instead of "Excellent managers have no problems," the message became, "Excellent managers want to hear about problems and surprises to prevent more serious problems."
Share stories. When there is a safety incident with an F-18 military plane, a report is prepared outlining what happened, what mistakes were made, and what will be done in the future to prevent these mistakes, said Commander Ken Green, DMD, a senior healthcare analyst for the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, United States Navy. That report is sent to everyone in the world who flies an F-18 plane. "But if there's an incident at Mass General Hospital, it doesn't mean that Boston [Medical Center] or Beth Israel Deaconess know about it," Green said, "unless it's on the front page of The Boston Globe, or spread by word of mouth."
It's hard sometimes to think outside of the things we do every day, but these six ideas certainly give a lot to think about. I'm at the Quality Colloquium's closing sessions today, and I expect that the conference will offer more ideas to ponder as it comes to an end.
Maureen Larkin is quality editor with HealthLeaders magazine. She can be reached at mlarkin@healthleadersmedia.com.
Note: You can sign up to receive HealthLeaders Media QualityLeaders, a free weekly e-newsletter that reports on the top quality issues facing healthcare leaders.
After 15 months of negotiations and three strikes, union-represented registered nurses and two California hospitals affiliated with Sutter Health have reached tentative agreements on new contracts. Nurses at Alta Bates Summit Medical Center and Marin General Hospital will now vote on whether to ratify the accord, which their negotiating teams have recommended. The nurses did not get a master contract with all Sutter Health affiliates, which was their priority. But they said the tentative agreement was reached on "pivotal patient protections issues."