Amazon Clinic is giving patients the transparency they want; and it’s something they're not getting enough of from traditional providers.
Retail giant Amazon is disrupting healthcare in several ways, but one of the areas Amazon Clinic is taking aim at is somewhere providers are especially vulnerable: price transparency.
As we know, healthcare costs can be incredibly cloudy, so Amazon Clinic's commitment to price transparency could force hospitals to become more competitive in their pricing structures—which could also lead to a possible downward pressure on healthcare prices.
But, while Amazon Clinic represents a major market disruptor for CFOs, organizations can adapt and compete by leveraging existing strengths, embracing price transparency technology, and prioritizing the patient experience.
Amazon’s delivery
Amazon Clinic contracts with four startups to offer virtual messaging and video appointments for around 30 medical conditions in an effort to create a retail experience for patients. After launching the initiative in November 2022, Amazon recently announced it was expanding to all 50 states, including asynchronous care in 34 states and nationwide telehealth services.
The convenience it affords patients is obvious, but Amazon Clinic also offers the kind of upfront pricing that providers have either struggled to share or so far been unwilling to. As detailed in a report by Forbes, Amazon Clinic can charge $35 for messaging with a physician who will respond within an hour and 45 minutes, or $40 to get a response in 30 minutes, while a video visit with a wait time of around 90 minutes can cost $74.
Essentially, Amazon is giving patients tiered pricing based on quality and quickness—and all that information is provided before the patient has to choose a service.
Aside from its current limitations in how many conditions it can offer services for, Amazon Clinic also doesn't accept insurance yet. So, while it may not be revolutionizing healthcare, it's still offering patients a unique alternative at a time when many traditional providers are struggling just to keep their doors open.
Transparent, not invisible
What can providers do when a disruptor like Amazon Clinic encroaches their lane? Building greater trust with patients by making their lives easier is a good place to start.
"Healthcare, I believe, is still a relationship business and will be at least for a while longer," Kris Kurtz, chief financial officer for the University of Michigan Health-West, recently toldHealthLeaders. "We have patient relationships today for the most part, so it's our business to loosen access, and the ease of use is probably the best strategy we can deploy. As an industry, we make it far too difficult for patients to enter and navigate the system. In some instances, we may need to partner with the disruptors rather than compete with them. [Likely it's] probably a combination of both."
When it comes to price transparency, providers need to get their house in order first. Depending on the source, compliance rates are varying wildly. The latest report by Patient Rights Advocate found that of 2,000 hospitals reviewed, only 36% were complying with the price transparency rule. The American Hospital Association fired back at the report, saying it "blatantly misconstrues" hospitals' compliance and pointed to a recent report by CMS that found that as of 2022, 70% of hospitals had complied with both federal requirements and 80% had complied with at least one.
Regardless, that still leaves many hospitals who are failing to comply and CMS itself has proposed changes to regulations to crack down on compliance in 2024. But compliance isn't the only issue with price transparency.
Handing prices over to patients and letting them decipher it is not enough. The complexity and size of the data creates a usability issue that is further worsened by lack of standardization for organization and reporting. That is where a service like Amazon Clinic shines by giving patients pared-down pricing without the need to seek it out.
It will likely take some time before there is a widescale adoption of that type of pricing feature by providers, but hospitals shouldn't skip steps in the meantime by not doing their part to be as transparent as possible to patients.
"The higher percentage of completeness regarding the publication of machine-readable files and accurate patient estimate tools, the closer we are to empowering patients to gain confidence in knowing how much their healthcare services will cost," Chris Severn, CEO of Turquoise Health, toldHealthLeaders. "Adherence from both hospitals and payers also eliminates a significant burden of negotiating new rates because all rate data will be publicly available, meaning fair rate calculation becomes simpler and accessible."
"Overall, these lead to lowering the cost of healthcare."
Wake-up call
What Amazon Clinic is attempting to do with their transparent, tiered pricing isn't unheard of and its aforementioned limitations make it more supplemental than a true replacement of care services, but providers should be getting the message loud and clear that innovation is necessary for them to survive in the future.
Providers still have the homefield advantage as the more trusted source for care and they still have a leg-up by allowing patients to pay with their insurance.
The technology side is where healthcare has to close the gap on retailers, but it will require a willingness to serve patients in a different way than has traditionally been the case.
"Most of us in the healthcare industry are trying to work on access," Kurtz said. "We tend to be one of the last industries to innovate. [Retail's presence in healthcare] will certainly accelerate that and force us to innovate. I don't know why healthcare has always lagged behind when it comes to digital innovation. But I think these retailers will definitely speed up our transition."
Outpatient settings are experiencing the biggest fluctuations due to patients potentially delaying elective procedures.
Hospitals could experience a rise in patient volume in the coming months, especially on the outpatient side, after a decline in the summer.
Patient volume has been a barometer of the financial health of providers following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Many of the largest for-profit hospitals reported encouraging admission totals in the second quarter of the year, which contributed to stabilizing operating margins.
July, however, brought a dip in patient volume and revenue as hospitals' financial performance worsened compared to previous months, according to Kaufman Hall's latest National Hospital Flash Report. Adjusted discharges per calendar day fell 7% month-over-month, with outpatient revenue per calendar day dropping 8%, compared to a 3% decline on the inpatient side.
At least on the outpatient side, the decrease in volume shouldn't come as much of a surprise, Janet Carbary, CFO at IRG Physical & Hand Therapy, told HealthLeaders.
"It's pretty typical on the outpatient side that it slows down," Carbary said. "We're very used to a summer dip because people go on vacation, they don't want to commit. We did see a little bit in July. We were blaming it maybe on the new COVID wave coming through, higher COVID numbers, and people are still reluctant to go into medical places if they have a high vulnerability to COVID. But it's not uncommon because staff and doctors all take vacations during the summer.
"I suspect we're going to see it bounce back up in September to pre-COVID numbers."
IRG may have already started to experience the autumn bump with record-setting volume for August, Carbary shared.
"We're a bit stunned by it ourselves," she said. "We have truly seen the first pre-COVID numbers. So we're excited about what we're seeing so far."
Carbary attributes the increase to demand rebounding after the pandemic kept patients away. Even with outpatient revenue per calendar day declining month-over-month in July, Kaufman Hall found it was still 9% higher year-over-year, 12% greater year-to-date compared to 2022, and a whopping 47% above 2020 levels.
"A lot of people delayed treatment until a time they felt comfortable to go get them," Carbary said. "People are just trying to get back to some sense of normalcy and they're not letting those things deter them or stop them like they were in the past."
With the current fiscal challenges, hospitals can improve their financial flexibility and stability by capitalizing on the shift to outpatient settings in a post-pandemic world. By implementing strategies to expand their outpatient footprint, rural health and critical access hospitals in particular may be able to keep their doors open.
Simply, hospitals that emphasize care transitions will be in a better position than those who don't. That could mean establishing relationships with local outpatient providers.
"I come out of the hospital environment and we don't do outpatient the same way freestanding outpatients do," Carbary said. "We're not as nimble and our systems aren't set up to accommodate, especially if you're a large acute care facility, you just don't do outpatients the same way and as efficiently as it can be done in an outpatient setting. So I see hospitals absolutely concentrating more on the outpatient side and the opportunity and the money to make it there, if they're efficient in how they do it."
Some payers have decided to shift their strategy or focus their attention on their core line of business.
While most major payers continue to reap profits, not every insurer has experienced smooth sailing over the past year.
Certain companies have either decided to leave markets or abandon their lines of business entirely.
Here's a look at five recent market exits by payers:
Cigna
The insurer announced it is trimming down its Affordable Care Act exchange offerings, notably leaving Kansas and Missouri in 2024.
Instead, Cigna will expand into 15 new counties in North Carolina, with the potential to reach an additional 200,000 members. With the shift, the payer will offer plans in 350 counties in 2024, compared to 363 in 2023, and in 14 states in total.
Cigna also revealed ACA plan benefits, which include 24/7 virtual care for members through MDLive, along with $0 preventive care, $0 copayments, and $0 deductibles on certain services.
"We take a thoughtful and deliberate approach to our geographic presence to ensure our plans meet high standards for affordability, network quality and comprehensive coverage," Chris DeRosa, president of Cigna's U.S. Government business, said in a press release.
Humana
Earlier in the year, Humana made the decision to leave its employer group commercial medical products business to continue making Medicare Advantage its priority.
The move came after a strategic review that determined the business could no longer meet commercial members' needs or support the company's long-term plans.
Medicare Advantage is Humana's bread and butter, with the payer commanding the second-largest market share behind only UnitedHealth Group.
"This decision enables Humana to focus resources on our greatest opportunities for growth and where we can deliver industry leading value for our members and customers," Bruce D. Broussard, Humana president and CEO, said in a statement.
Friday Health Plan
It's been a disappointing journey for Friday Health Plans as it wound down its operations this summer.
After raising hundreds of millions in investments, the insurer eventually sputtered out, leaving tens of thousands of members in search of new health plans.
"Unfortunately, Friday has been unable to scale our financial infrastructure to match the pace of our growth and secure the additional capital required to run our business," the company said in an announcement.
Bright Health
By selling its Medicare Advantage business in California to Molina Healthcare in a deal worth approximately $510 million, Bright Health is now completely out of the insurance business.
The sale allows the company to pay off its debts and obligations to bank lenders and put money towards its liabilities in its discontinued ACA insurance business.
The struggling insurtech was facing bankruptcy and had been slashing its reach in insurance, choosing to instead build around its care delivery business.
"The sale allows us to focus on driving differentiation and sustainable growth through our Consumer Care Delivery business," Mike Mikan, president and CEO of Bright Health, said in a statement.
Oscar Health
Another insurtech, Oscar Health, will leave the California individual market for 2024 with the intention of reentering the state down the road.
Last year, the payer also announced exits for the Exchange and Medicare Advantage markets.
Nevertheless, the company said following the first quarter of 2023 that it expects to hit profitability this year.
"A year ago, we were focused on absorbing our increased scale, ensuring that our operations could handle a sizable increase in growth," said newly appointed CEO Mark Bertolini on a call with investors. "Today, we are focused on advancing the capabilities and technology to best serve our members and have been able to shift our attention to implementing a series of initiatives aimed at improving the efficiency of our operations."
Understand the value you bring to the table and have a long-term strategy, says one CFO.
After historic levels of private equity (PE) deal-making in 2021 and 2022, activity dipped in the first half of this year as firms dealt with debt service costs and other economic challenges—but that doesn’t necessarily mean your organization is safe from the PE disruption.
PE deals are expected to rise though in the second half of the year and into 2024 as the debt market recovers and inflationary pressures settle.
This just goes to show that PE’s presence in healthcare isn't diminishing anytime soon, even if the level of activity doesn't return to the record-breaking highs during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
CFOs have decidedly realized that if you can’t fight PE, you might as well partner if necessary, so reading the market and recognizing the ebbs and flows of PE is critical for providers who are considering partnerships with firms.
What is the state of PE now?
As it stands, hospitals aren't the only ones under financial stress—investors are also dealing with economic pressures that are causing them to move cautiously.
The result has been a slowdown in PE deal-making in the first half of 2023 following two straight years of historic investing. Thanks in part to the trillions in monetary stimulus the economy received to offset the effects of the pandemic, 2020 saw a record $151 billion in total deal value, according to research from Bain & Company. That breakneck pace didn't sustain in 2022 as market forces in the second half of the year caused a dip to $90 billion, but it was still more than $10 billion greater than the next-closest year.
Recent research by PitchBook, revealed that PE deals in healthcare declined "unexpectedly" in the second quarter of 2023. An estimated 164 deals took place in 2023, the lowest figure since the second quarter of 2020 and a decrease of 23.7% from the first quarter of 2023. While it marks the sixth straight quarter of deal count declines, the second quarter was still 12.3% higher than the average quarterly deal count in 2018 and 2019.
Much of the deceleration is due to heavily leveraged platforms feeling squeezed by growing debt service costs and upcoming maturity walls from the federal funds rate being set at 5.5%, Pitchbook notes.
It’s not all downhill though.
It's expected that PE activity will steadily climb again in the second half of the year and into 2024. Pitchbook believes a "gradual reversal" is coming with buyers more willing to accept prices lower than those from the past two years. As the economy stabilizes, inflationary pressures settle, and the debt market recovers, PE deal-making should pick up as firms have their dry powder at the ready.
What does this PE activity mean for CFOs?
It’s not out of the question for CFOs to consider partnering with PE firms, especially when there are minimal financial alternatives.
PE isn't all bad, Janet Carbary, CFO at IRG Physical & Hand Therapy, told HealthLeaders.
"They can help a company grow. They can bring in some expertise on the ground that the company doesn't have, especially in the finance and marketing area. And they certainly give the company access to capital," Carbury says.
But keep in mind they aren't in it for the long term, "private equity is rarely in it for longer than five years," she says.
Still, some providers may see a PE deal as an opportunity to shed management and administrative responsibilities to focus all their efforts on delivering high-value care. PE firms can provide financial relief or allow a practice owner to exit on their own terms.
"There are so many owner-operators who don't have a really good exit strategy for when they retire and no longer want to be an owner-operator," Carbary said. "It does potentially give the owner-operator a way to transition their company into a little bit longer term exit strategy for the company and the employees."
So how can providers capitalize if they are looking to partner? Carbary offers two pieces of advice: know your worth and know what you want to accomplish, both in the short- and long-term.
"You have to understand your value as a provider," Carbary said. "Too often owner-operators out there don't have a good idea of what their company is worth. It's really important that you feel like you're in control and that you know you're valuable coming in and that private equity is interested in you because they feel like they can continue to add value."
Do you want to remain independent? In that case PE is probably not the way to go, Carbary warns. "Or do you want to sell a minority share that's going to bring in capital to allow you to grow to a point where you can essentially buy them out again? You as a provider have to have a very clear understanding of what your relationship is going to be with private equity."
Private practices can also take steps to make themselves more attractive to PE firms, such as auditing workflow processes and implementing new technology.
Regardless of whether providers ever make the leap into PE, being ready to jump at the right opportunity will be an advantage during this new normal of PE in healthcare.
Most major health insurers are so far experiencing positive results in the face of unknowns.
The largest payers continued to see profits in the second quarter, despite concerns of increased utilization.
Familiar names were at the top of the charts, with UnitedHealth Group paving the way at $5.5 billion in profit, followed by CVS Health at $1.9 billion.
Not unlike their counterparts on the provider side, health insurers this year have had to maneuver through their own set of issues, although as their second quarter earnings reports showed, it hasn't hurt the bottom line much.
Here are three takeaways from the second quarter:
Utilization is up, but not alarmingly so
Insurers were already bracing for utilization to go up from deferred services as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Those fears, the second quarter indicated, were not unfounded, but they weren't fully borne out either.
Some of the medical loss ratios experienced by payers were 83.2% for UnitedHealth, 86.2% for CVS, 86.3% for Humana, and 81.2% for Cigna. While the figures were on the higher end compared to recent quarters, they were mostly manageable.
Where utilization has especially increased is in outpatient settings as patients begin to seek out care they delayed during the pandemic.
"Bottom line, I don't really think the benefits are driving this," UnitedHealth Group CEO Andrew Witty told investors. "When you look at the concentration of what we're seeing in terms of the outpatients, the orthopedics, in particular, those sorts of areas, it looks very much more like a kind of deferment of care."
CVS also reported utilization increase in outpatient settings, particularly on the Medicare Advantage (MA) side.
Fallen star ratings
Speaking of MA, payers projected realistic outlooks for their star ratings, which have taken a hitacross the board in 2023.
Cetene CEO Sarah London told investors that the insurer anticipates losing its only four-star MA contract—plans with at least four out of five star qualify for bonus payments that can be used to offer supplemental benefits.
"While this is disappointing, we do expect to see meaningful movement in our three- and 3.5-star plans in October, and roughly two-thirds of our members are in plans showing year-over-year improvement," London said.
Humana, meanwhile, expressed confidence in their position and reported significant improvement in star ratings for CenterWell Home Health, with the percent of its branches with 4.5 stars or above increasing from 18% in January to 50% in the second quarter.
Bonus payments have been a boon for MA insurers, with KFF estimating qualifying plans will collect at least $12.8 billion in bonus payments this year—an increase of 30% from 2022.
MA payers are working to account for CMS' adjusted methodology for star ratings to continue bringing in the payments.
Medicaid not redetermining expectations
The ongoing Medicaid redetermination process is creating a potential drain in membership, but insurers have so far conveyed cautious optimism that it won't be too detrimental.
Elevance Health president and CEO Gail Boudreaux said she was encouraged that Medicaid members losing coverage are transitioning into Affordable Care Act exchange plans. The insurer reported a loss of 135,000 Medicaid members in the quarter, but managed a net income increase of 13.2% year-over-year.
"It's still early in the process, and our expectations for coverage transitions remain unchanged," Boudreaux said on an earnings call.
For Centene, Marketplace membership grew to 3,295,200, up from 2,033,300 over the same period in 2022, while the Medicaid business increased to 16,059,600, compared to 15,446,000 year-over-year.
London said the performances of both sectors are "running slightly ahead of expectation."
From expenses to admissions, there are a few key indicators that CFOs need to know that both positively and negatively affected recent earnings reports.
The financial outlook for hospitals across the nation is moving in a positive direction, albeit with challenges still standing in the way.
After the largest for-profit health systems released their second quarter earnings report earlier in the summer and as nonprofits continue to release theirs, patterns have emerged indicating America's hospitals are beginning to see some financial relief.
It's evident that now is still not the time for CFOs to let their financial guards down, but the squeeze may be lessening for some.
Here are three significant trends we saw in the second quarter:
Labor costs down, total expenses still up
Arguably the biggest priority for healthcare CFOs right now is reducing costs without sacrificing potential growth. Part of that task is finding a way to bring down labor costs, which have been a thorn in executives' sides amidst a workforce shortage.
The second quarter, however, saw some health systems produce encouraging results. HCA Healthcare slashed labor costs by 20% compared to last year's second quarter, while also increasing nurse hiring by 9%, CEO Sam Hazen told investors.
Community Health Systems (CHS) cut its labor costs by 15% to $74 million, a drastic change from its peak of $190 million in the first quarter of 2022, CEO Tim Hingtgen said on an earnings call.
Other hospitals, however, saw their labor costs go in the opposite direction and even with improvement in that area, HCA or CHS couldn't bring down their total expenses for the quarter, which increased 7.6% and 1.9%, respectively.
Bringing down total expenses remains an obstacle for healthcare leaders, but having a process-oriented mindset can help, Ochsner Health CFO Jim Molloy recently toldHealthLeaders.
"It is important to develop a culture in which leaders seek continuous improvement, while also measuring the appropriate things and benchmarking yourself in key areas against best-in-class organizations," Molloy said. "While it is important to always keep a mindset toward reducing expenses, the true key to success for any organization is disciplined growth."
Admit one (or more)
Another positive development for hospitals has been the rise in admissions as demand has rebounded after the COVID-19 pandemic kept patients away.
Universal Health Services (UHS) experienced an increase of 7.7% in adjusted admissions, following an uptick of 10.5% in the first quarter.
At Tenet Healthcare, same-hospital admissions increased 3% year-over-year, with non-Covid admissions up 5%, contributing to a strong overall second quarter.
Meanwhile, Mayo Clinic saw a 6.5% rise in outpatient visits, an area many hospitals are both experiencing growth and targeting to maintain financial stability.
Stacy Taylor, CFO at Nemaha County Hospital, recently shared with HealthLeaders why focusing on outpatient services has been vital to the critical access hospital.
"We try to stay in the market by bringing in as many outpatient doctors that we can from the bigger cities so that they can see patients here. This way, patients are not driving an hour to get to the city, and we can see them here at the hospital in a rural setting," Taylor said.
Operating margin inching forward
Even as most hospitals underperformed, the median year-to-date operating margin index for June increased to 1.4%, according to Kaufman Hall's National Hospital Flash Report.
Comparatively, the operating margin index was at 0.7% in May, and the bump in June was partly a result of fiscal year-end accounting adjustments, Kaufman Hall noted.
The increase was helped by a dip in aforementioned labor costs, as the report found the proportion of full-time equivalents per adjusted occupied beds fell 8% from May.
Further indicating a shift away from inpatient settings, the report also revealed an increase in outpatient revenue.
Members want more from their health insurer, but different generations require different approaches.
If you're a health plan and want to not only retain your members, but attract new ones, the status quo may not be enough.
A one-size-fits-all approach may not be either, with older beneficiaries preferring one type of experience, and younger members wanting another. That's why health plans have to deliver highly personalized care—something they're seemingly not doing enough of.
Recent surveys, studies, and analysis have shown member satisfaction to be relatively low right now. The newest piece of evidence comes from a survey of more than 2,800 beneficiaries by digital healthcare company HealthEdge, which found that only 45% of respondents are fully satisfied with their health plan, while 55% want more from their insurance.
The survey also reveals differences among generations. Respondents aged 18 to 24 were four times more likely than other age groups to prefer digital communication with their health plan, such as texting and mobile app messaging. Respondents aged 65 and up, on the other hand, preferred traditional forms of communicating, such as phone calls and emails.
However, commercial health plans are struggling to meet patients' engagement needs. A separate study by J.D. Power, based on response from 32,656 commercial health plan members, uncovered that overall member satisfaction dropped by 13 points this year (on a 1,000-point scale), mostly due to a 33-point decline in customer service and a 16-point decrease in information and communication.
Another report by Accenture, released near the end of 2022, revealed the top reasons why beneficiaries leave their insurers. Nearly half of almost 11,000 respondents (49%) cited ease of navigation as the number one factor for switching, which includes: inconsistent or inaccurate information, unanswered questions, poor experiences using digital tools, poor customer service, and discomfort with how payers used their personal data.
Switching up coverage and benefits, or increasing provider choice, is likely a bigger ask for health plans than improving the engagement experience. Focusing on digital tool offerings, customer service, and convenience can be low-hanging fruit for payers to appeal to beneficiaries, particularly of the younger generation who are more prone to switching plans.
Gabriella Gold, director of Network Strategy and Innovation at CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield, recently shared at the HealthLeaders' Payer NOW Summit some unique solutions to improving the member experience in behavioral health that her health plan is seeing results from.
"An example of a technology we've rolled out to all our commercial members is an asynchronous chat function that mimics a coffee conversation with a close friend or family member," Gold said.
"We've also partnered with an organization to bring all of our solo practitioners together and incentivize technology use for charting and appointment scheduling. We're now seeing streamlined appointment bookings in under four days whereas previously, members were calling five to 10 providers and not getting a call back for 30 days. We've seen great strides there."
For health plans, building and maintaining loyalty with beneficiaries isn't just about trust and consistency, but also about demonstrating a willingness to evolve to meet members' needs and expectations.
While digital engagement may not always be the priority for members, it's the area where insurers can potentially make strides fairly quickly to improve satisfaction.
Back-end revenue cycle management is a top priority as organizations seek operational and cost efficiency.
Even in a tight economic environment that is forcing healthcare organizations to scale back costs, many hospital and health system leaders are still eyeing investments in automation to improve workflows and save money in the long run.
Revenue cycle managment (RCM) solutions especially can significantly reduce administrative burden, allowing staff to spend time and energy on what matters most: improving and delivering care.
The risk of spending more for the reward of operational efficiency appears worth the squeeze for more than one-third of health system executives in a recent survey who said they are planning to automate two or more RCM or finance functions in 2024. The survey, conducted by the Healthcare Financial Management Association and strategy and market research company Eliciting Insights, fielded responses from 321 health system executives in May.
Back-end RCM was selected as the highest automation priority, with 40% of executives saying they planned to invest, followed by patient access (37%) and mid-revenue cycle (32%). Within RCM, the biggest areas of focus highlighted by respondents were prior authorization (39%), denials/appeals management (37%), and patient self-service/digital front door (37%).
Covenant Health senior vice president and CFO Stephen Forney recently shared with HealthLeaders how the multi-state, Massachusetts-based health system is fighting "financial toxicity" through integrating AI.
"At Covenant, we've seen how AI can play a crucial role in addressing financial challenges by streamlining workflows and improving revenue cycle management," Forney said. "We leverage an automated philanthropic aid platform, Atlas Health, that helps keep us up to date on the latest aid programs, alerts us when they're open for enrollment, and helps match our patients to the program they're best suited for, streamlining the process significantly for all stakeholders.
"Integrating AI into our systems promotes efficient resource utilization and better financial outcomes."
Health systems appear to also be interested pursuing standalone RCM solutions, whether those are vendors that offer an all-encompassing range of tools, or single functionality vendors that can improve specific areas. According to the survey, 95% of executives planning to purchase RCM or finance technology and services are willing to consider "bolt-on" vendors outside of their EHR systems.
Joann Ferguson, vice president of revenue cycle at Henry Ford Health, toldHealthLeaders that her advice to other health systems considering AI is to do their due diligence, find the right fit, and be willing to pursue the best solutions.
"Going for the quick fix or using last year’s technology because it's cheaper will only make change more painful in the future," Ferguson said. "That means finding a partner who understands rev cycle operations and AI, and what your team needs to be successful.
"AI products that will grow and can keep pace with the breakneck speed of tech innovation in healthcare are a must, not a 'nice to have.'"
The publicly operated health plan has seen an increase in requests for resolving claims and requests for potential advances coming out of the pandemic.
Months into taking over the reins as CFO of L.A. Care Health Plan, Afzal Shah understands the financial challenges facing not only his organization, but also his counterparts at hospitals.
"They want their claims paid faster," Shah says.
During a time in healthcare when payers and providers have little choice but to work together to ensure mutual success, it's critical both sides recognize what the other needs.
Shah knows that better than most, having previously served as deputy CFO at L.A. Care, senior vice president at Alignment Healthcare, and vice president for Actuarial Services at Health Net and Centene.
In an exclusive interview with HealthLeaders, Shah shared how he's collaborating with hospital CFOs, addressing claims disputes, scaling back expenses while eying growth, and more.
This transcript has been lightly edited for clarity and brevity.
HealthLeaders: What has the experience been like in the first few months as a CFO in the current financial climate?
Shah: After the pandemic, there have been quite a lot of changes, impacts to our providers and our partners, including our IPAs [Independent Physician Associations] and especially the hospital community and the nursing facility community. We've definitely seen an increase in requests for paying claims faster, requests for potential advances, and loans. We officially don't give out loans, but we can give an advance related to directed payment that usually the state gives us to pass on to hospitals and we have offered millions and millions of dollars in those advances to hospitals to provide financial relief to them.
And then separately for L.A. Care, we are certainly looking at our team, our resources, our admin, our vendor spend, contracting spend. Our goal and my goal for the company is I want to see a sustainable company for many, many years to come, long after I'm gone. So we are reviewing all of our departments and our spend internally to see how we can manage to live within the revenue. We are heavily, heavily dependent on the revenue we get from the state of California, so how we can live within the revenue that the state gives us for both our admin costs, as well as our healthcare costs spent.
HL: Healthcare organizations everywhere are trying to cut costs, but how do you grow while keeping expenses low?
Shah: We are doing both, looking at our healthcare dollars and where we want to spend the right amount of dollars for the right price, in terms of purchasing services. We are looking at our network. Where do we need to add providers in the market? We are also looking at, in the individual market, people who may fall off of Medi-Cal due to redetermination. We have a home for them in Covered California and we continue to be the lowest price plan for that. We are also reviewing all of our admin spend and looking at each and every department. There are areas where we are looking to add staff where it's needed and then at the same time there are areas where we are looking to make changes.
Afzal Shah, CFO, L.A. Care Health Plan.
HL: What are the areas of focus for investment right now?
Shah: Security is a big one for us. Our IT team is very focused on security. That's very, very important to us. We have made some investments in the health services team. We heard from many of our hospital partners, they wanted more focus, they wanted more regular meetings, updates. And as we know, there are multiple changes on the state side in terms of the Medi-Cal program with CalAIM, Enhanced Care Management, community support. So we are also making investments to ensure that we can comply with all of the requirements of the state and the new benefits and programs that are impacting the Medi-Cal population, which of course is the majority of our population.
HL: How do you view the current payer-provider relationship and what can you do to improve it? Putting yourself in the shoes of a hospital CFO, how do you see it from their side?
Shah: I talk to hospital CFOs on a weekly basis. The leadership team is very committed to making sure we are listening to the issues that hospitals are facing and we are responding. We've had some very positive meetings with the CFOs. We are figuring out ways to address the issues. I think a lot of what we certainly hear is they want their claims paid faster than even before the pandemic, at times. That's what I hear a lot. If there are claims disputes, how do we address them in a timely manner. I've been working all summer with many of the CFOs to address some of those issues and there's still a long way to go, but we have been working with them collaboratively and listening to them.
There's definitely, in terms of medical inflation and changes in the healthcare industry, we've heard of certain hospital closures. So I do want to recognize that the economic environment is a fairly challenging one for hospitals and we are doing everything we can to help, such as with advances that we've made to hospitals for the ones that need it, for example.
HL: How can you tailor payment and care models to gain a win-win with providers, whether it's with fee-for-service, fee-for-value, or capitation?
Shah: We currently have a very diverse model of care, in the sense that we have three plan partners: Anthem Blue Cross, Promise, and Kaiser. We delegate membership to those plan partners, which we believe is a good thing because certainly that way our members have a choice of not just L.A. Care, but also the plan partners. But we also delegate risk to hospitals and IPAs, and because of that, sometimes there are timing issues. If a provider sees an L.A. Care member, oftentimes they may send us the claim, but the claim may not belong to us. It may belong to a delegated party. It may belong to a plan partner that we have delegated risk to, for example. While this very complicated payment methodology structure we believe is providing good service to our members, it can create some delays and we are working collaboratively with our hospitals, as well as our plan partners and delegated payers to really see how we can address the root causes of those delays.
There are also delays sometimes with Medicare, Medi-Cal claims where there's coordination of benefits—a provider has sent us a claim but we don't have the amount that Medicare would pay. So we also are working on addressing how we can, on a more timely basis, address those types of claims where there's a different party that's the primary payer versus the secondary payer.
The federal agency has made the changes after receiving feedback from stakeholders and participants.
CMS announced changes to the ACO REACH Model for 2024, which will advance health equity and afford participating providers more predictability.
ACO REACH is a value-based model that replaced the Global and Professional Direct Contracting Model and encourages providers to form an Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) to shift away from fee-for-service in Medicare while taking on more financial risk. There are currently 132 participants in the model, which began on January 1, 2023, and runs through performance year (PY) 2026.
The updates to the model further incentive providers to participate. Included in the changes is a reduction on the beneficiary alignment minimum for new entrant ACOs from 5,000 to 4,000, as well as for High Needs Population ACOs from 1,200 to 1,000 for PY2025 and from 1,4000 to 1,250 for PY2026.
CMS is also providing a 10% buffer on alignment minimums for all ACOs starting in PY2024, which will allow ACOs to temporarily drop their beneficiary count while continuing to participate in the model.
Eligibility criteria for alignment to a High Needs Population ACO is being refined so beneficiaries with at least 90 Medicare-covered days of home health services utilization or at least 45 Medicare-covered days in a skilled nursing facility within the last year are included.
Additionally, CMS is revising the risk adjustment methodology in Medicare Advantage. PY2024 risk scores will be blended using 67% of the scores with the 2020 standards and 33% of the scores under the new 2024 model.
When it comes to the Health Equity Benchmark Adjustment (HEBA), CMS is adding two new variables—low-income subsidy status and state-based area deprivation index—to calculate the composite measure for identifying underserved beneficiaries.
HEBA will also see expanded access with CMS adjusting the ACO benchmarks in the modified policy to $30 per person, per month for beneficiaries with the highest equity scores.
The changes to the model make it more predictable for participants, maintain consistency across CMS programs and models, protect against inappropriate risk score growth, and advance health equity efforts.
Clif Gaus, president and CEO of the National Association of ACOs (NAACOS), said the updates address many of the concerns that have been raised by NAACOS members.
"We believe these changes will satisfy many concerns and stabilize future participation," Gaus said in a statement. "Additionally, we encourage CMS to explore adding features of REACH into a permanent track within the Medicare Shared Savings Program. Using MSSP as a chassis for innovation while infusing lessons learned from Innovation Center models into a permanent program is another path for stabilizing and growing participation in ACOs."