Aurora Health Care said it will open Wisconsin's first entirely green hospital in Grafton on Nov. 1.
The 106-bed, 520,000-square-foot Aurora Medical Center in Grafton cost $184 million, and will provide integrated care for thousands of residents in Ozaukee County, north of Milwaukee, Aurora said in a media release.
The hospital is nearly 80% complete, including most of the exterior. At the end of summer medical equipment to support surgeries, diagnostics and rehabilitation will arrive, with installation expected to take three months to complete. After that, the equipment will undergo testing and certification, Aurora said.
Aurora Medical Center in Grafton is being built to Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) standards, which provides third-party verification that a building was constructed using environmentally friendly processes.
The original plans in 2007 called for Aurora Medical Center in Grafton to have 89 beds. Another 18 beds were added in the final design to account for anticipated increases in patient volume from physicians who have joined Aurora and Aurora Advanced Healthcare. The adjustment also reflects the projected rise in orthopedic surgeries based on demographic data.
The non-profit hospital will offer specialty services including cardiac, cancer, and neurological care, a 24-hour emergency department, an orthopedic center, a neonatal ICU, and advanced technology for diagnoses and treatments.
Milwaukee-based Aurora Health Care operates 13 nonprofit hospitals and 140 clinics in eastern Wisconsin. The medical center will bring more than 600 jobs to the area.
Allowing nurse anesthetists to provide anesthesia services without supervision from a doctor does not put patients at risk, according to a study in an issue of Health Affairs.
The study’s authors say the findings call into question a requirement that nurse anesthetists be supervised by an anesthesiologist or surgeon to receive Medicare reimbursement. States can “opt out” of the requirement, but only by petitioning the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The study confirms that certified registered nurse anesthetists, who receive high-level training, are able to provide the same level of services as anesthesiologists at potentially lower cost.
“This study shows that patient safety was not compromised by the opt-out policy,” says Jerry Cromwell, a senior fellow in health economics at the Research Triangle Institute and coauthor of the study. “We recommend that CMS change the policy so that governors no longer have to petition for their states to opt out of this Medicare requirement.”
The study analyzed rates of death and complications from surgery in the 14 states that “opted-out” and found no increase in the odds of a patient dying or experiencing complications. They also found no significant differences when they compared patient outcomes across three scenarios: certified registered nurse anesthetists working without anesthesiologist supervision, anesthesiologists working alone, or the two types of provider working together on a case.
Cromwell and coauthor Brian Dulisse, a health economist at RTI, analyzed 481,440 hospitalizations covered by Medicare. They found that the frequency of nurse anesthetists’ providing anesthesia without anesthesiologist supervision grew from 1999 to 2005. As of 2005, 21% of surgeries in opt-out states and 10% in non-opt-out states used nurse anesthetists without anesthesiologists, as opposed to 17.6% and 7% in 1999. The authors speculate that the increase could be due to anesthesiologists’ taking on more privately insured cases and leaving more Medicare cases to certified registered nurse anesthetists.
The researchers also found that although nurse anesthetists are trained to handle very complex cases, anesthesiologists, on average, work on more of these cases, which involve greater risk of death. The authors hypothesize that anesthesiologists, who can choose their cases more often than can certified registered nurse anesthetists, prefer more complex, better-paying, cases. Anesthesiologists also are more prevalent in teaching hospitals that perform more complex surgery.
“Nurse anesthetists get essentially the same training in anesthesia as anesthesiologists. So in this case, a nurse is just about a perfect substitute for the doctor,” says Cromwell. “Eliminating physician supervision will not only allow nurses to do what they are trained and highly qualified to do, but it will encourage hospitals and surgeons to use a more cost-effective mix of anesthetists.”
Using nurse anesthetists more broadly could help save on health care costs because they typically earn less than anesthesiologists, the authors say.
A report from the American Medical Association finds an average of 95 medical liability claims filed for every 100 physicians.
The report, released Tuesday, prompted renewed calls from the AMA for comprehensive national and state-level tort reforms.
“Even though the vast majority of claims are dropped or decided in favor of physicians, the understandable fear of meritless lawsuits can influence what specialty of medicine physicians practice, where they practice and when they retire,” says AMA Immediate Past-President J. James Rohack, MD. “This litigious climate hurts patients’ access to physician care at a time when the nation is working to reduce unnecessary healthcare costs.”
The report—which includes data from the AMA’s 2007-2008 Physician Practice Information survey of patient-care physicians and other sources—has data on medical liability claims’ impact by age, gender, and practice arrangement for physicians.
The report shows:
Nearly 61% of physicians age 55 and over have been sued.
There is wide variation in the impact of liability claims between specialties. The number of claims per 100 physicians was more than five times greater for general surgeons and OB/GYNS than it was for pediatricians and psychiatrists.
Before they reach age 40, more than 50% of OB/GYN have been sued.
90% of general surgeons age 55 and over have been sued.
The number of medical liability claims is not an indication of the frequency of medical error, AMA says, because the physician prevails 90% of the time in cases that go to trial. While 65% of claims are dropped or dismissed, they are not cost-free. Average defense costs per claim range from a low of over $22,000 among claims that are dropped or dismissed to a high of over $100,000 for cases that go to trial. This leads to increased costs for physicians and patients.
“The AMA supports proven medical liability reforms to lower health care costs and keep physicians caring for patients,” Rohack says. “The findings in this report validate the need for national and state medical liability reform to rein in our out-of-control system where lawsuits are a matter of when, not if, for physicians.”
Help wanted ads for healthcare professionals dropped by 18,400 listing in July, even as the overall economy saw a modest increase of 139,200 in online job listings, a report released Monday shows.
The Conference Board's Help Wanted Online Data Series, which tracks more than 1,000 online job boards across the United States, said the drop in healthcare job ads was largely due to decreases in advertised vacancies for physical and occupational therapists, speech pathologists, pharmacists, physicians, and surgeons.
The Conference Board said labor demand varies greatly from the higher-paying practitioner and technical jobs, to the lower-paying support jobs. In June, the latest month for which unemployment data is available, advertised vacancies for healthcare practitioners or technicians outnumbered those looking for work in the fields by more than two to one.
The average wage in these jobs is $33.51 an hour. In marked contrast, the average wage for healthcare support occupations is $12.84 an hour and there were more than two jobless people looking for work in the field for every advertised vacancy.
The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, which will release its employment statistics for July on Friday, has shown that the healthcare sector is one of the few areas in the economy that has seen monthly job growth throughout the recession, although that growth has slowed considerably since 2009. Despite the overall growth in the healthcare sector, hospitals for May and June have seen more than 4,600 job reductions—the first back-to-back cuts since January through April, 2000.
"After rising sharply in December and January, online job demand for the nation as a whole has settled into a more modest pattern over the last six months, with increases that have averaged about 43,000 per month," said June Shelp, vice president at The Conference Board. "The gains in job demand vary across the country with some East Coast states—New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Delaware and Maryland?posting steady and strong upward trends throughout this year. Steady but more modest improvement better characterizes online job demand in other states like Washington, Ohio, Oregon and Texas."
Among the Top 10 occupations advertised online, there were more vacancies than unemployed people seeking positions for computer and mathematical science, healthcare practitioners, and architecture and engineering.
In transportation and material moving, there were more than eight people seeking or every online advertised vacancy, and there were more than four unemployed looking for work in installation, maintenance, and repair positions for every advertised opening.
Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick this summer signed into law a bill that stiffens criminal penalties for those who assault on-duty nurses and other healthcare providers.
The new law treats assaults on healthcare professionals doing their jobs as a separate crime with its own set of penalties—extending to healthcare providers the protections and enhancements that were already in the law for assaulted emergency medical technicians.
"This law gives us the tools to further protect the many healthcare professionals who work tirelessly to ensure the care of all Commonwealth residents," Patrick-flanked by nurses-said at a signing ceremony in his office.
Donna Kelly-Williams, president of the Massachusetts Nurses Associationwhich lobbied heavily for the law said it validates nurses' concerns and will raise public awareness of about violence in the healthcare workplace. "Nurses are assaulted on the job to the same degree as police officers and prison guards," she said.
While Bay State nurses are cheering the new protection, they also say it's not enough. Kelly-Williams said two other MNA-sponsored bills that would address healthcare violence are opposed by the Massachusetts Hospital Association. One of the bills requires healthcare providers to have in place proactive policies and procedures to prevent workplace violence from occurring in the first place. The second bill calls for what MNA describes as "safe patient limits for nurses, as the lack of staff to adequately respond to patients and families concerns [that] is a major factor leading to these types of incidents." Translation: staffing ratios.
"We have been trying for over 10 years to get safe patient limits assigned to an RN at one time and that has been met with much opposition," Kelly-Williams said, adding that MHA has "fought us every step of the way."
Kelly-Williams said it's almost impossible to talk about other safety strategies—such as de-escalation—if nurses are already overworked and unable to recognize and address the behavior of patients in pain, or with substance abuse or mental health issues, and their anxious relatives and friends.
MHA issued a statement saying it is aware of the concerns of hospital safety and has long supported increased criminal penalties for those who assault healthcare workers. MHA said its member hospitals have "gone to great lengths to provide a variety of security and social services to maintain a level of safety in both the clinical setting and administrative offices. Such safeguards are designed to address the unique needs of every community. A 'one size fits all' approach simply doesn't work in dynamic hospital settings."
Even with the best planning, MHA said it is impossible to account for every potentially violent situation in the hospital setting, owing to the hospital's unique healing mission, and the fact that it is open 24 hours a day to the general public. "While important safeguards are continually updated and improved, healthcare facilities are stressful environments and violence can be perpetrated by patients, families, friends, visitors, and even co-workers," MHA said.
The MHA raises valid points. For hospitals, staffing ratios could prove to be extremely expensive, and the benefits could be questionable if the management and scheduling aren't done properly. This is a legitimate bottom line issue.
However, MNA can make the emotional connection with the public on this issue. Overworked nurses and long waits in the ER provide visceral images for the public many of whom have endured that experience. The argument that violence occurs in part because understaffed nurses can't adequately control upset patients is simple, commonsensical, and easily understood for most of the public. This message will resonate even more in the coming months and years as millions of newly insured Americans?unable to find care elsewhere—head to the ER for medical treatment.
The American Hospital Association is strongly protesting the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Service's newly announced 2.9% final inpatient rule reimbursement cuts for Fiscal 2011, saying the economic impact from the loss of an estimated $3.7 billion in cuts could prove catastrophic for the nation's 3,500 acute-care hospitals.
"The rule cuts billions of dollars from the healthcare system at a time when patients are sicker, more people are losing coverage due to the economic downturn and hospitals are dealing with significant changes contained in the health reform bill," said AHA President/CEO Rich Umbdenstock. "The changes also will have unintended consequences; hospitals have been an economic mainstay during the recession, but the cuts create real potential to harm hospitals' ability to provide jobs."
Newly installed CMS Administrator Donald Berwick, MD, defended the cuts, which federal law dictates must recovered from hospitals that were overpaid for coding changes in FY 2008 and 2009 that did not reflect real changes in the patient mix.
"The final rule we are issuing will ensure that Medicare pays hospitals accurately for inpatient services for Medicare beneficiaries while fostering continuing improvements in the quality and safety of care," Berwick said.
The final rule applies to approximately 3,500 acute-care hospitals paid under the Inpatient Prospective Payment System, and approximately 420 long-term care hospitals paid under the LTCH Prospective Payment System, for discharges occurring after Oct. 1, 2010. It also updates the rate-of-increase limits for some hospitals excluded from the IPPS that are paid on a reasonable cost basis subject to these limits.
Umbdenstock said CMS failed to listen to concerns from members of Congress.
"A bipartisan majority of senators and representatives had expressed to CMS that the rule's coding offset would hurt their communities' ability to access healthcare," he said. "CMS also failed to acknowledge independent studies that show CMS' methodology does not take into account what we all know: hospital patients are increasingly sicker."
Professional on-site interpreters in the emergency department greatly improve patient and physician satisfaction, and might improve efficiencies and outcomes, according to a study in the Annals of Emergency Medicine.
"The results were the same for physicians and nurses, which could be important for reducing staff burnout and errors. The improved quality of care can also reduce the likelihood that a patient will return to the ER for the same health problem," Bagchi said.
Researchers enrolled 242 patients in the in-person, professional interpreter group and 205 patients in the control group. Of the patients assigned to the interpreter group, 96% were "very satisfied" with their ability to communicate during the ER visit. Of the patients in the control group, only 24% were "very satisfied."
"Professional interpreters can improve efficiency and throughput in the ER and can shorten overall length of stay, an important consideration in view of Press Ganey's recent report showing a new high in the average amount of time people are spending in the ER," said study co-author Robert Eisenstein, MD, vice chair of emergency medicine at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital in New Brunswick, NJ.
"Using the same interpreter from triage to discharge creates continuity of care and also ensures that we are not missing anything important when talking to the patient," Eisenstein said. "It has the potential to help us get a more accurate patient assessment on arrival in the emergency department as well as better patient compliance with discharge instructions because the patient actually understands what we're telling them to do!"
The Department of Justice has filed an amended false claims suit against Satilla Regional Medical Center in Waycross, GA, and a staff surgeon, alleging that the doctor botched endovascular procedures that resulted in the death of one patient, and that the hospital ignored complaints from nurses about the surgeon's competence.
The complaint—first filed in April, and based on a whistleblower suit—alleges that the 231-bed hospital and a staff physician, Najam Azmat, MD, submitted false claims for surgeries and other hospital services that were unnecessary, and of no medical value. Prosecutors also claim the defendants' alleged misconduct endangered the lives of Medicare beneficiaries.
The government further alleges that Satilla recruited Azmat, a general surgeon, to join the hospital's medical staff in 2005. Shortly after Azmat came aboard, Satilla allowed him to perform endovascular procedures in Satilla's Heart Center cath lab, despite Azmat?s lack of training for the specialty procedure.
According to the complaint, Azmat's alleged incompetence in endovascular procedures was "obvious to the cath lab nursing staff," who repeatedly voiced concerns to Satilla's management. The hospital allegedly took no action for at least five months, during which time one patient died from hemorrhagic shock following an endovascular procedure where Azmat allegedly perforated her renal artery. The complaint states that Satilla's management performed no formal oversight of Azmat, excluding his endovascular procedures from Satilla's peer review process.
"When healthcare providers cut corners by allowing unqualified doctors to perform complicated medical procedures, patients suffer," said Tony West, assistant attorney general for the Civil Division of the Department of Justice. "Here, we allege individuals were endangered because of these defendants. The seriousness of this case illustrates why we remain committed to protecting patient safety and the integrity of our federal healthcare programs by aggressively enforcing our health care fraud laws."
This lawsuit was originally filed by whistleblower Lana Rogers, a former nurse in Satilla's Heart Center.
Satilla officials said they were still reading the amended complaint, but noted that the new suit has left out allegations that the government made in April, and that the amended complaint also drops claims against Satilla's employees.
"This means the government has effectively thrown out a significant portion of the so-called whistleblower's lawsuit on its own. The amended complaint is hardly news—it is essentially a narrower version of a four-year-old medical malpractice claim that has yet to prove a single fact. Satilla will continue to defend itself vigorously against these meritless allegations," the hospital said in a written statement.
Maybe it was the heated debate on “death panels,” or the inflamed rhetoric about “socialized medicine” and “rationed care,” or the arcane complexity of the sweeping reforms.
Whatever the reason, another online poll shows that most Americans are confused by the healthcare reform law. The Harris Interactive/HealthDay poll found that a majority of the 2,104 adults who took the online survey from July 15-19 could correctly identify only four of 18 reforms included in the new law.
About 58% of adults polled know that the reform package will prohibit insurers from denying coverage to people because they are already sick; 55% know the law permits children to stay on their parents' insurance plan until age 26; and 52% realize that people who don't have insurance will be subject to financial penalties. Half are aware that employers with more than 50 employees will have to offer their workers affordable insurance.
Among other findings: 63% of those polled either aren't sure or don't know if the new law will increase the number of people eligible for Medicaid, (it will); 79% don't know or aren't sure if drug companies will pay an annual fee, (they will); 73% don't know the law establishes a new tax on the sale of medical devices; 66% don't know or aren't sure if the legislation will result in insurance exchanges where people can shop for insurance, (it will); and about 82% think the bill will result in rationing of healthcare, or aren't sure if it will. (It won't).
"The problem for the Obama administration is healthcare reform is fiendishly complicated because the healthcare system is fiendishly complicated, and it is not politically feasible to tear up the system and build it again," says Humphrey Taylor, chairman of the Harris Poll. "Instead you have to build on the system that you have. When you try to build on a fiendishly complicated system, you have fiendishly complicated reforms."
Another cause of the confusion is the long and heated political debate that surrounded the bill before it was passed, Taylor says. "The level of ignorance and misinformation is sort of astounding," he says. "It seems people are still reacting to the rhetoric, not the substance of what is in the bill, because they don’t actually know what is or is not in the actual legislation."
The Harris findings jive with a National Council on Aging poll released Monday which shows that only 17% of 636 seniors surveyed knew the correct answers to more than half the factual questions posed about key aspects of new law, particularly as they relate to Medicare, and only 9% knew the correct answers to at least two-thirds of the questions.
CVS Caremark has signed a 12-year contract to provide pharmacy benefit management services for 9.7 million Aetna customers.
Under the deal, announced this week, Aetna will retain its PBM and manage clinical programs, protocols and oversight of its pharmacy benefits business. CVS Caremark will serve approximately 9.7 million Aetna PBM members and administer approximately $9.5 billion in annual drug spending.
CVS Caremark will also manage purchasing, inventory, and prescription fulfillment for Aetna's mail-order and specialty pharmacy operations. The contract will go into effect on Jan. 1, 2011. As part of the agreement, Aetna will transfer to CVS Caremark approximately 800 PBM employees who will work in support of the transferred functions. Aetna will retain approximately 1,000 PBM employees.
"We worked hard to construct a strategic solution that enhances our value proposition in the marketplace in a way that creates a durable competitive advantage for Aetna and long-term value for our shareholders," says Ronald A. Williams, Aetna chairman/CEO. "Through this strategic agreement, we retain our PBM and our ability to integrate medical care with clinical and pharmacy programs and actionable data. We will add CVS Caremark's best-in-class clinical capabilities and broad market reach, enabling us to deliver better drug discounts and improved pricing and service to our customers."
CVS Caremark says its PBM platform capabilities include:
Broad access across multiple channels;
Face-to-face counseling at retail pharmacies and MinuteClinic locations, online, by phone and through specialty and mail service pharmacy support;
A Pharmacy Advisor program, powered by CVS? Consumer Engagement Engine;
Procurement, fulfillment, contracting;
Physician engagement through e.prescribing, real-time physician support, and pharmacist support.
Aetna will maintain and manage its core pharmacy benefits business, including:
Medical and pharmacy policy, including formulary and benefit design and network configuration;
Clinical integration of pharmacy and medical benefits, including integrated care management and utilization management programs;
Clinical program development, protocols and oversight;
Sales and marketing activities;
Management of member appeals and grievances;
Rebate contracting and administration;
Ownership and management of its mail order and specialty pharmacies.
CVS Chairman/CEO Thomas M. Ryan says his company?s integrated, multichannel platform will improve outcomes and save money for Aetna customers. "Aetna's selection of CVS Caremark is a testament to our integrated pharmacy care model as well as our reputation for service excellence," Ryan says.
