When I began performing the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) procedure in 2003, we held monthly three-hour educational seminars for prospective patients in order to explain risks and benefits, to discuss qualifications, insurance, and alternatives, and to answer questions.
Screening and educating potential patients about surgical procedures is essential to ensure that those who wish to proceed are eligible and informed. Clinical practice guidelines published this year indicate that prior to bariatric surgeries, patients should receive educational materials and access to preoperative educational sessions.
But these seminars were frustrating for several reasons. Attendance at each seminar was about 80 to 100 people, so the room quickly became uncomfortably warm and crowded. We often did not have enough bariatric chairs to accommodate everyone. Some people arrived late and others left early, disrupting the presentation. Often one person would monopolize the floor with questions that others might consider too personal. Several might be too embarrassed to ask questions at all. The lack of privacy was a huge issue. Patients absorbed maybe 20% of what we told them.
The results were equally uninspiring; a mere 10% of attendees actually pursued the surgery. It was a highly inefficient process and I felt like I was spinning my wheels. I had to find a better way to educate and screen prospective patients.
I discontinued the seminars and in 2005 and implemented a Web-based patient education. Prospective patients instead were given a "prescription" access code to log onto a 30-minute Web-based multimedia program created by Emmi Solutions, which covers pre-, peri- and postoperative care, as well as risks, benefits, and alternatives to LAGB surgery.
The beauty of this interactive patient education tool is that people can view it at home, as often as desired, and they can share it with family and friends. They can pause, rewind, and type in questions for me to address with them later, in private. Patients can also print out a copy of the presentation for future reference or bring it with them to their next consultation, ensuring that they have a baseline of knowledge. In addition, my staff and I are able to track whether a prospective patient has viewed the information, as the entire patient viewing process is recorded and archived in a secure database.
The benefits of this approach are manifold. My mandatory one-on-one preoperative meeting with each patient (which ensures that he/she fully understands the surgery and risks) used to take two hours. The Web program cut that time down to one hour because they came to me with a much better understanding of the procedure than they did after attending a seminar.
Our surveys show that patients are thrilled; they appreciate how informative it is, and the convenience and privacy of watching from home. In fact, they often refer other patients to my practice in part because of this initiative. My staff is happier, too. They no longer need to answer as many clinical questions and therefore can more efficiently screen out patients who are ineligible for the surgery, either for medical reasons (10 -15%) or due to insurance coverage (30%-40%).
Best of all, virtually all eligible patients who view the Web program now elect to undergo the procedure, increasing the number of surgeries I perform each year. In 2004, prior to implementing the Web-based program, I performed 198 surgeries. In 2007 I performed 284 surgeries, a 43% increase. Thus, the program has greatly improved our bottom line.
Charles E. Morton, III, MD, PC, FACS, is medical director of Bariatric Services at Baptist Hospital Metabolic Surgery Center in Nashville TN.
For information on how you can contribute to HealthLeaders Media online, please read our Editorial Guidelines.
Barack Obama's incoming administration has begun to draw on the high-tech organizational tools that helped get him elected to lay the groundwork for an attempt to restructure the U.S. healthcare system. Thomas A. Daschle, Obama's point person on healthcare, launched an effort to create political momentum in a conference call with 1,000 invited supporters culled from 10,000 who had expressed interest in health issues, promising it would be the first of many opportunities for Americans to weigh in. The healthcare mobilization will also include online videos, blogs, and e-mail alerts as well as traditional public forums.
Sharpening the emerging debate over how to reshape the country's healthcare system, America's Health Insurance Plans has unveiled a proposal for covering all Americans in a more centralized insurance market. The AHIP plan would require all Americans to get coverage. In exchange, insurers would agree to longtime demands from consumer advocates that they no longer reject people with preexisting medical conditions. But consumer groups fear that a mandate requiring Americans to get insurance could force people to buy unaffordable coverage unless state or federal authorities can regulate how much insurers charge.
An official Los Angeles County assessment has acknowledged for the first time that a woman who died after writhing in pain for nearly an hour on the waiting room floor of Martin Luther King Jr.-Harbor Medical Center could have been saved if she had been properly treated. The woman was captured on security videotape as a janitor mopped around her and a triage nurse dismissed her complaints. Her death helped to precipitate the closure of the hospital's emergency room and inpatient care after federal regulators determined that staffers had failed to deliver a minimum standard of care.
Nasvhille-based HCA Inc. is letting go an unspecified number of corporate employees, including more than 100 people from its information technology department. Ed Fishbough, a spokesman for HCA, said the layoffs affect all departments at HCA's corporate headquarters. In addition to the latest cuts, HCA recently said it would close its 38-bed Portland Medical Center in Sumner County, TN.
The United Automobile Workers union has announced that it would make major concessions in its contracts with the three Detroit auto companies to help them lobby Congress for $34 billion in federal aid. At a news conference UAW president Ron Gettelfinger said that his members were willing to sacrifice job security provisions and financing for retiree healthcare to keep General Motors and Chrysler out of bankruptcy. He also said the union would agree to delay the multibillion-dollar payments to a new retiree healthcare fund that the automakers were scheduled to start making in 2009.