Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, is pounding on two non-profit hospitals demanding to know whether they restrict the care they give patients based on their ability to pay. Grassley has been bearing down on hospital tax breaks worth millions of dollars, saying he is concerned that non-profits are "losing sight of the public service that comes with tax-exempt status." In a press release, Grassley said the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center "made it into the limelight for reportedly requiring a critically ill patient to come up with exorbitant amounts of cash upfront and badgering her for cash during medical treatment."
Approximately 800 doctors who fled Iraq's bombings, kidnappings and sectarian killings have returned over the summer. Although the doctors are just a tiny group among Iraq's more than 4 million refugees and displaced, Iraq's health minister says their homecoming sends a message that security has "improved dramatically." Some 8,000 physicians have abandoned jobs at government health centers since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003. Their departure has further crippled a healthcare system plagued by corruption, mismanagement and a lack of equipment and drugs.
It takes strong leadership skills to navigate the waters of physician-hospital competition and collaboration. The questions to consider are "Where do you want your organization to be?" and "Where is it now?"
First of all, we probably have to invent a new C-suite for the hospital. Currently, we have CEOs, CFOs, COOs, CNOs, CMOs, and so forth, but is this sufficient? In addition to, or in place of the above, what we really need now are the following:
Chief change officer
Chief collaboration officer
Chief communication officer
Chief competition officer
Chief conflict officer
Chief culture officer
Chief cultivating influence officer
Regardless of the titles used in your organization, the point to consider is that a new set of leadership and management competencies is required to lead contemporary healthcare organizations. These new competencies or the "seven Cs" are:
Embracing change
Seeking collaboration
Increasing communication
Handling competition
Managing conflict
Influencing culture
Cultivating influence
Embracing change
Change inevitably causes stress, and different personality types respond to stress differently. A working knowledge of primary personality preferences and their reactions under stress can help leaders diagnose and treat roadblocks in the process of embracing change. Tools such as the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator or the Dominance-Influence-Steadiness-Conscientiousness Profile provide insights into seemingly inexplicable behavior. For example, many physicians using the MBTI show the following patterns:
Sensing, which is characterized by attention to immediate details and practical applications. When stressed, this style might have difficulty seeing the implications of the big picture and recognizing culture and trends.
Thinking, which is characterized by a rational and objective approach to decision-making. Under pressure, this style overlooks the effect of decisions on others and values product first and process second (if at all).
Judgment, which is characterized by focusing on a product that can be implemented and used. Under stress, this style is uncomfortable with uncertainty and might revert to controlling behaviors.
Seeking collaboration
It is important for leaders to understand that how they respond to conflict is a matter of their conflict style. There are two primary responses to conflict. The first is assertiveness, in which you seek to satisfy your own concerns. The second is cooperativeness, in which you seek to satisfy the concerns of others. Within these two primary responses, several outcomes are possible. These include:
Avoidance, by which neither party satisfies its concerns.
Competition, in which you seek to satisfy your concerns at the expense of others.
Capitulation or accommodation, in which you satisfy another’s concerns at your expense.
Compromise, in which each party gives up some of its concerns to satisfy the other. Although many people view this as the highest form of negotiation, it often leaves both parties feeling dissatisfied or manipulated.
Collaboration, a preferred method of negotiation in which both parties appreciate the conflict as a mutual problem to be solved. This allows the parties to discover new, expanded, or increased alternatives to satisfy their concerns.
There are different methods for actual negotiation, not all of which will result in collaboration. These include:
Positional-based negotiation, in which the bargaining occurs around positions. The danger is a tendency to lock in to these positions. For example, the more you clarify your position and defend it, the more committed you might become to it.
Power-based negotiation, in which one party holds a dominant position over the other either by authority, positional power, or leverage. A threatened pullout of emergency department call within two weeks by your surgical staff when there are seemingly no other alternatives is an example of leverage. This style of negotiation does not lead to seeking collaboration.
Principle-based negotiation, which is described by Roger Fisher and William Ury in Getting to Yes. This method involves four steps:
Separate people from the problem.
Focus on interests and not positions.
Invent options for mutual gain.
Insist on using objective criteria.
This method of bargaining is designed to facilitate and increase collaboration and should be part of every healthcare leader’s toolkit.
Increasing communication
Communication is the glue that holds everything together. There are two facets to this. The first is the actual method of sending communications. The second is a toolkit of communication skills.
Medical staff members and hospital leaders need to communicate with several stakeholders (e.g., the medical staff, hospital administration, board, and community). A comprehensive communication plan must include multiple modalities, approaches, and channels to communication. Communication, especially in this 24/7 age of instantaneous news, needs to be timely, accurate, and transparent. Constantly trying new methods of communication insures freshness, vitality, and interest.
Effective multichannel communication includes:
A monthly physician and/or internal hospital newsletter distributed in the medical staff lounge and sent to all physicians’ office staff members by e-mail, fax, or mail.
A medical staff Web site continuously updated with news, items of interest, and other matters pertinent to the medical staff.
A letter, fax, or e-mail sent regularly to key stakeholders, informing them of important issues and decisions.
A "quick flash" briefing letter to address timely issues that need immediate input from medical staff or hospital members. Print the letter on brightly colored paper to get their attention.
Webcasts, podcasts, or CDs for informing physicians and hospital members about important issues and decisions.
A medical staff telephone hotline for physicians to call with comments, complaints, or suggestions. This is a useful method for physicians to voice their concerns in a nonthreatening environment.
Scheduled office hours for medical staff leaders so physicians can discuss suggestions and concerns in private.
Effective committee and development meetings, with minutes distributed to the appropriate staff members. However, do not fall into the trap of believing that because an issue was discussed at a meeting, further communication is not necessary.
An idea board at all meetings, which can include a flip chart with several markers so that questions, issues, and suggestions can be solicited, recorded, and researched prior to the next meeting.
Opportunities for social interaction to increase the social capital of the organization. Multiple opportunities exist, including:
An off-site one-day retreat with the medical staff, board, and administration. Regularly scheduled breakfast or lunch with medical staff leaders and hospital administration.
Informal quarterly socials with hors d’oeuvres. Invite the medical staff, administration, and board.
An effective communication toolkit must also be developed. Hospitals that train board members, administrators, and medical staff leaders in effective communication techniques will see benefits throughout the organization. Several techniques and resources are available to develop communication skills, including:
Style assessments. These identify medical staff leaders’ personal strengths and weaknesses. For example, style assessments might identify passive-aggressive communication patterns or a need for skill training in assertive communication.
Role-playing. This method allows leaders to practice responding to realistic case scenarios in a low-risk environment. This technique can be invaluable in equipping medical staff leaders to deal with the inevitable conflicts that arise.
Personal coaching. Some physicians and other leaders might benefit from personal coaching that develops communication skills through individualized instruction.
Formal education programs. Many on- and off-site seminars, classes, and retreats are available to organizations.
Video- or audiotaped scenarios. Medical staff leaders might be able to identify useful communication strategies by viewing taped scenarios that are similar to situations they might encounter.
Good listening skills. Effective listening is one of the most important skills of effective communication. It promotes trust, builds relationships, and leads to increased understanding. Good listening is fueled by curiosity and empathy, traits possessed by many physicians.
Books on writing styles. These are readily available and help hone the development of clear and crisp written communication.
See next week's issue for Part 2 of this series, which will cover handling competition, managing conflict, influencing culture, and cultivating influence.
William K. Cors, MD, MMM, CMSL, is the vice president of Medical Staff Services at The Greeley Company. He can be reached at wcors@greeley.com.
For information on how you can contribute to HealthLeaders Media online, please read our Editorial Guidelines.
I hear a lot about establishing a "team" atmosphere in hospitals. Whether you're trying to build a better workplace environment, improve your quality, or mend your finances, a key element to just about every hospital improvement effort involves a team approach.
Employees may read the companywide newsletter, e-mail alerts, and bulletins about standards of care and hospital best practices, but perhaps more importantly they are also watching how the senior executives embody the organizational culture.
If the executive offices have the best views in the organization, the nicest bathrooms, and the finest food, you may be sending the wrong message to your staff. Namely, that your comfort is more important than the comfort of your patients. Do you really need the lakeside panoramic views? Some hospital CEOs are saying, no. They're trading their picturesque views for offices overlooking the parking lot, or relocating their executive suites to the lower levels of the hospital and freeing up the prime real estate for patients. The message to the staff: Patients are the No. 1 priority.
Similarly, do you pause to escort a lost patient or visitor to their destination? Do you have a preferred parking spot, or do you park with the rest of the employees? Do you eat in the hospital cafeteria? In the grand scheme of running a hospital these things may seem pretty insignificant. They aren't going to help you improve your revenue, reduce mortality rates, or increase market share. Or, are they?
These small acts can help you earn the respect of your employees by showing them that the same rules and expectations that apply to the nurses, physicians, technicians, and other staff apply to the senior executives, as well. People want to work for leaders and companies that they can respect. And once established, this atmosphere of teamwork and collaboration can lead to big rewards. For example, increased employee satisfaction and retention can lead to a more engaged work force, which can lead to improved patient outcomes and satisfaction scores, resulting in better reimbursement.
If employees believe that patients are the priority and see that you are actively working to improve employee satisfaction, quality scores, and hospital finances, they will gladly join your effort. But if employees think that all the talk about teamwork and collaboration is just that—talk—and that nothing has changed, or worse yet, quality scores and patient volumes or satisfaction rates have actually declined, you're probably not going to get much support for your efforts.
Editor's Note: Every year, we have the unique opportunity to hear how senior-level healthcare executives are overcoming challenges through our annual Top Leadership Teams in Healthcare awards program. If you would like to learn more about these successes, please join us in Chicago October 16 and 17 for our Top Leadership Teams in Healthcare Conference, which features more than 40 senior-level healthcare leaders.
Carrie Vaughan is leadership editor with HealthLeaders magazine. She can be reached at cvaughan@healthleadersmedia.com.
Note: You can sign up to receive HealthLeaders Media Corner Office, a free weekly e-newsletter that reports on key management trends and strategies that affect healthcare CEOs and senior leaders.
St. John Health’s new Novi, MI, hospital, opening this month, and a Henry Ford Health System facility to begin business by March in West Bloomfield, MI, raises the question of whether other hospitals will be hurt by the competition. Given stagnant population trends, the two new hospitals and their competitors may find it hard to make money, experts say.
Rhode Island officials are seeking unprecedented authority to rein in Medicaid spending to offset a severe budget shortfall. The plan could save the state millions of dollars, but critics say it would limit access to nursing homes, charge poor families more for medical care, and potentially establish waiting lists or cut people from the program. The critics are now urging the Bush administration to reject the state's request for a waiver to cap its Medicaid spending at about a quarter of the state budget without regard to rising healthcare costs or the number of families in poverty.