With all the relentless and fevered reporting about swine flu, the A/H1N1 virus, I called two hospitals that have been identified by the 24-hour mainstream news cycle as certified hot spots to get an on-the-ground perspective.
How are the employees holding up? Is the pressure of treating a horde of coughing, wheezing, fevered, and contagious people taking its toll on an overworked and frazzled hospital staff? Is anyone showing up for work?
"Not much to report. It's business as usual," says Lorraine Orlando, vice president of human resources at New York Hospital Queens.
The hospital has treated a number of people who are suspected of having the virus, but is awaiting confirmation from CDC.
"Whether it's gunshot wounds or flu or whatever, our people come to work, they do their jobs, they are smart about following CDC guidelines," Orlando says. "Everybody is out there buying Purell now. Well, hospital workers have been using Purell for a long time."
Karin Barrett, program coordinator for employee health services for Arlington-based Texas Health Resources Inc., offered similar less-than-alarmist rhetoric when asked about the impact swine flu was having on the 18,000 employees at the 14-hosital system. "Nobody's really expressing any anxiety. We are treating it no differently than any other flu season. It's just that we have two of them this season," Barrett says.
In Texas, 43 cases of swine flu had been confirmed as of this morning, including 13 cases in three counties that THR serves. Citing HIPAA privacy constraints, THR officials declined to say if any of those cases had been diagnosed in their health system. Regardless, Barrett says employees are taking the news in stride. "I know most of us are helping-type people. You just feel like you need to come in to work," she says.
Neither hospital is in denial about the potential problems posed by swine flu, nor are they ignoring the issue. But Barrett and Orlando express confidence in their hospitals' measured responses to the virus. In short, they're not freaking out. Neither is staff.
Hospital workers tend to be a fairly tough breed to begin with, so they are not easily spooked about a public health issue that has rattled the public and fueled endless anxiety-laced media coverage.
The best tool they can give staff, both women stressed, is communicating about the status of the virus and the safety precautions that should be taken, with an emphasis on hand washing, and sneezing and coughing in sleeves to avoid contaminating hands. Otherwise, the only issue has been higher-than-normal patient volumes, many of whom are the so-called "worried well."
"Nothing has been activated. There's been nothing formal. No drills or alerts or anything has been called," Orlando says. "What you see in the newspapers isn't always the case."
I don't necessarily think this flu reporting is a case of media hysteria or an overreaction by public health officials. The news is a little bit fevered, admittedly, but there are still a lot of unknowns about this virus, the threat is still with us, and an abundance of caution is warranted.
Still, it is refreshing to get a level-headed report from front-line healthcare professionals dealing with the virus. They are aware of the issue. They are taking the necessary precautions. The situation is under control. Stay calm. Lorraine Orlando says it best: "We're a hospital. We deal with sick people every day."
Note: You can sign up to receive HealthLeaders Media HR, a free weekly e-newsletter that provides up-to-date information on effective HR strategies, recruitment and compensation, physician staffing, and ongoing organizational development.
Jacksonville, FL-based Nemours began system-wide layoffs, including 106 employees that are being cut from its three Florida locations. The health system said in April that it planned to eliminate 325 positions, including 85 open positions that would be cut through attrition, in anticipation of a $60 million shortfall in operating revenue.
Deborah Pass Durham, president of ATS Services, Inc., has been named chair of the board of directors of Wolfson Children's Hospital and will begin to serve this month. She has been a member of the Wolfson board since 2003. Pass Durham has served since 1992 as president of ATS Services, a staffing and executive recruiting organization with 22 offices in 11 states.
The American Nurses Association has named Marla J. Weston, PhD, RN, as CEO effective June 14. Weston will also serve as CEO of the American Nurses Foundation, the research, education, and charitable arm of ANA. Since September 2008, she has served as deputy chief officer of the Workforce Management and Consulting Office at the Department of Veterans Affairs in Washington, DC.
St. Vincent's HealthCare has announced the selection of David Pringle as its executive vice-president of mission integration, effective June 1. Before joining St. Vincent's, Pringle was vice president of administrative services and assistant vice president of mission integration at St. Mary Medical Center, part of St. Joseph Health System in Apple Valley, CA.
Gregory R. Angle has been named president and CEO of Los Robles (CA) Hospital and Medical Center, effective immediately. Prior to accepting this position, Angle served as CEO of Carondelet St. Joseph's Hospital in Tucson, AZ. He also had various executive leadership positions in hospitals throughout the Southwest that are owned by HCA, Inc., the parent corporation of Los Robles Hospital.
Ed Gaines, vice president and chief compliance officer with CBIZ Medical Management Professionals, describes how hospitals are handling the RAC appeals process.
Healthcare employs more people than most other sectors of the U.S. economy. Spending is predicted to rise to $2.6 trillion this year and account for 18% of the gross domestic product. There are certainly plenty of opportunities to earn a good living taking care of others.
If asked, however, most people in healthcare would presumably say their initial reason for working in the industry had something to do with helping or caring for people. This is one of the reasons our nation's healthcare is the best in the world. It can at times also create an unintended conflict with a provider's fiscal health. Patient care and even certain aspects of patient satisfaction are completely dependent upon a facility's financial well-being.
In the past several months we've seen an assortment of macroeconomic factors affect hospitals, physicians and other providers' abilities to provide care and sustain their operations. Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements continue to decline. Investment income is disappearing. National unemployment is higher than it has been in many years, adding to the record count of uninsured Americans who still need care. Admission volumes are down. The increasing popularity of consumer-directed care, high-deductible health plans and health savings accounts has created more patient financial responsibility and less reliance on insurer reimbursements.
These factors have made an already complex and difficult proposition for healthcare providers even more overwhelming. Cancelled or delayed capital expenditures, layoffs, program cuts, and even bankruptcies and closures continue to dot the headlines. According to Thomson Reuters more than half of U.S. hospitals are reporting operating losses.
In many ways the healthcare industry's reaction to the current economic situation is telling of pre-existing problems. Many hospitals that entered the downturn in poor financial standing have simply not been able to endure the added pressures. Holes in hospitals' administrative and financial practices have been exacerbated. Best practices still exist, though, amid all the doom and gloom; according to the same Thomson Reuters report the half of the nation's hospitals show a profit, so they must be doing something right.
At the most fundamental level, in order to maintain long-term operational viability hospitals have to rededicate themselves to the financial side of healthcare. The hospitals currently operating at a profit presumably carried out this approach in times of prosperity and as a result are better prepared to weather unforeseen and uncontrollable financial pressures. That's not to say patient care should not remain priority one, but if the books consistently bleed red then there is ultimately no chance of fulfilling the core mission. Providers must operate as businesses first—even not-for-profits—and help their patients understand that without adequate payment for services they will cease to exist.
This is a real paradigm shift for many providers, but is never more true or important. During the more than 35 years I have worked in healthcare, I have seen the industry move through numerous peaks and valleys and each time have been fortunate to witness some best practices from providers who emerged successful. Healthcare may be more resistant to the cycles of our economy than some other industries but is clearly not immune. The one common denominator for successful providers is a strong emphasis on the financial side of the business, which naturally allows for better patient care and even patient satisfaction. In my experience there are several specific strategies providers use consistently to manage this balance.
Enhance internal processes to capture all reimbursements
Within an organization's existing patient population there are usually opportunities for additional revenue that can be capitalized upon with better processes.
Reduce claim denials and bad debt. The more accurate a hospital can be on the front end, the lower the claim denial rate and AR days. Using technology to automate and replace manual processes can empower administrative and financial staff to work faster, more efficiently, and more accurately. Manual processes often lead to error, which leads to denied or rejected claims and potential bad debt, which is currently crippling hospitals.
Check every self-pay patient for Medicare and/or Medicaid coverage. On average, 10% of patients who receive treatment as "self-pay" qualify for Medicare or Medicaid. Eligibility checks should be performed prior to service and after service, if necessary, to identify retroactive coverage. The federal government estimates that spending on Medicare and Medicaid will rise from about 4% of gross domestic product in 2009 to nearly 6% in 2019 and 12% by 2050, so providers should take every measure to capture legitimate reimbursements and avoid writing off debt. Doing so can be especially costly for safety net facilities serving a primarily indigent population. In a six-month period in 2008, New Jersey-based Meridian Health identified more than $1.7 million in billable Medicaid charges it may otherwise have written off.
Verify medical necessity compliance. Hospitals performing outpatient tests or treatments from physician orders should validate medical necessity compliance. Providers will not be reimbursed for denied claims and cannot bill patients without a signed advance beneficiary notice of non-coverage. The medical necessity validation process can be performed in advance of the patient visit for all scheduled procedures and just prior to service on unscheduled procedures. An automated medical necessity validation process and a smooth order entry process can dramatically improve hospital/physician relationships and save precious staff time.
Capture all relevant patient data prior to service
Fortunately most providers have recognized the need for collecting critical patient data up front. In any situation short of an emergency, proactive treatment should not be issued before a defined set of information is gathered and validated.
Avoid fraud and identity theft.Confirm patient demographic information such as a social security number and an address to be certain they are who they say they are. Verify patient identity by reviewing photo identification for every patient. Theft and fraud is generally more prevalent during difficult economic times, and hospitals are likely targets for criminals seeking free care. The Federal Trade Commission's Red Flag Edits compliance enforcement deadline for having identity theft-related processes in place is May, so providers are now actually mandated to address these issues. It can also eliminate or reduce unnecessary administrative work.
Verify real-time insurance eligibility for all patients.Make certain that every patient who presents as having insurance has his or her coverage validated. Gather up-to-date co-pay and deductible information during scheduling and pre-registration and verify again during registration or at the point of service. A patient whose eligibility has changed due to a recent job loss, for example, may not be inclined to divulge the most accurate information, and even with COBRA coverage, benefits can change.
Audit registrations for quality assurance. Inaccurate information should be flagged and corrected before services are rendered and certainly before a claim is submitted to avoid unnecessary work and costly mistakes on the back end.
Tap into up-front revenue streams
The information described above can be leveraged to increase proactive front-end collections from insured and uninsured patients.
Provide patient payment estimates. Reconcile charge master data with contracted rates and patient benefits to arrive at an accurate up-front price estimate. Consistent price transparency will have a substantial impact on the bottom line and on patient satisfaction.
Implement policies and processes for discount and charity care. Enable front-end personnel to make educated decisions on the spot about whether patients qualify for free or discounted care based on credit scores and other information.
Increase collection points. Accept patient payments in the form of cash, checks, and credit cards at locations throughout the facility. Offer convenience in the form of interest-free medical finance cards or payment plans with automatic recurring deductions. West Virginia University Hospitals nearly doubled its point-of-service collections in three years following the installation of credit card processing systems in its hospital and physician clinics.
Set the proper expectations with patients. Uninsured and insured patients presenting in non-emergent situations should expect to pay for at least some portion of treatment. With accurate information, training, tools, and scripting front-end personnel should be comfortable and confident asking for payment. Patients will become accustomed to the policy and cash collections will rise.
By applying these best practices healthcare providers can mitigate the impact of a recession and protect their long-term financial outlook. No hospital or other healthcare facility can carry out its mission of patient care if it becomes financially insolvent.
Jeff Drake is chief sales and marketing officer of Passport Health Communications Inc. He can be reached at jeff.drake@passporthealth.com.
For information on how you can contribute to HealthLeaders Media online, please read our Editorial Guidelines.
Though the rise in healthcare spending has slowed, it's taking up a much bigger space in the nation's budget, says a new report from the California Healthcare Foundation.
The report showed that national healthcare spending reached $2.2 trillion, or $7,421 per person, in 2007 representing more than 16% of the gross domestic product. Continuing at the same pace, it will reach 20.3% of the country's gross domestic product by 2018.
"Although there has been some moderation in health spending growth in recent years, its share of the economy continues to grow," the report says.
"This report shows the very trend that's behind a lot of the financial woes of the healthcare industry," said CHF senior program officer Marian Mulkey. "The fact that we are spending more and more on healthcare services translates into higher premiums, and makes it harder for businesses and employees to afford coverage. This documents the problem that is at the heart of the debate about health reform."
Mulkey said that the report, the sixth one in a series of annual reports, called Health Care Costs 101, is based on data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Among the points in the report:
Healthcare costs grew nationally by 6.1% in 2007, the smallest increase since 1998, extending a five-year decelerating trend. Yet it continues to outpace inflation and is projected to reach $2.5 trillion this year.
The recession will more than offset the recent moderation in health spending, causing medical care's share of the GDP to rise rapidly to 17.6% this year.
Per person costs for healthcare increased 81% between 1997 and 2007.
While out of pocket costs for consumers continue to rise, over the past 40 years they have declined as a share of overall health spending, and are now flat at about 14%.
Almost half of the medically underserved areas (MUAs) nationwide (43%) lacked a community health center site in 2007—down 3% since the previous year, according to figures released May 1 by Government Accountability Office (GAO).
This increase in centers is related in part to more federal funding for the centers, according to Cynthia Bascetta, director of healthcare with GAO. However, some areas of the country may be disproportionately affected: the Midwest census region had the most MUAs that lacked a health center site (62%) while the West census region had the fewest MUA's without site (32%), she said at a Senate hearing the day before on community centers.
These percentages are important when one considers that more than 60 million Americans, many with insurance, "can't find a medical home--can't find a doctor, a dentist, mental health counselor, and can't get access to prescribed medications," said Bernard Sanders (I-VT), who chaired the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee hearing.
"There's not going to be real reform or [creation of] cost effectiveness to a healthcare system . . . unless we address that issue." He added, though, that changes may be coming with a doubling of the amount (to $4 billion) to fund community health centers under the stimulus law.
Daniel Hawkins, a senior vice president with the National Association of Community Health Centers, said at the hearing that the centers "cost significantly less money--saving the health system overall." For instance, a recent national study done in collaboration with the American Academy of Family Physicians found that healthcare centers save the healthcare system about $18 billion annually.
If this was extrapolated further--for instance, if every person in America received care that health centers provide--more than $500 billion a year could be saved in healthcare spending, Hawkins said. One of the reasons is less specialty care—but whether it's because health center patients are getting less specialty care or other patients outside the centers are getting more specialty care than necessary remains to be studied, he said.
Fitzhugh Mullan, MD, noted that the density of physicians today is 272 per 100,000 population, which puts the U.S. "in the middle of the pack" in terms of physician-patient ratio in industrialized countries. However, the distribution of physicians across the country leans more to urban and well-to-do areas.
Less than 10% of the country's physicians practice in rural areas, while 20% of the population lives there, Mullan said. Metropolitan areas have primary care ration of 93 physicians per 100,000 people compared with 55 physicians per 100,000 people in non-metropolitan areas, Mullan said.
In addition, he said that only 2% of medical student questioned in a medical survey said they wanted to be general internists. As one study predicts, this means that the U.S. could be short by approximately 40,000 primary care physicians in 15 years. Increased investment in the National Health Service Corp could help expand the number of physicians practicing nationwide, especially in high-need areas served by community health centers.