This year, as I bagged seemingly thousands of pounds of multi-colored leaves, it occurred to me that this is only the precursor to the real work. After all my leaves are all cleared away, I have back-breaking snow shoveling to look forward to.
That's when it hit me, raking is what hospital CFOs have been doing the last two years to get their financial yards in order (and things are starting to look decent), but with a host of other challenges ahead, including healthcare reform, it looks like the forecast is calling for snow, so CFOs had better prepare to start shoveling.
I'll explain, but first there is some good financial news for hospitals I want to share. You see, hospitals have been diligently analyzing areas of overspending these many months and your efforts are paying off; 80% of all hospitals are back in the black, according to a research paper Hospitals Continue Financial Recovery released today from The Center for Healthcare Improvement(CHI), a division of Thomson Reuters.
There's more good news: large community hospitals which were hit hardest by the recession—in Q4 2008 nearly 60% of large hospitals reported negative total margins—improved drastically, and now only 8% of facilities are in the red as of Q2 2009, the CHI report notes.
"Many hospitals have recovered to prerecession levels [for total margins]," says Gary Pickens, PhD, CHI Chief Research Officer and coauthor of the paper, which surveyed over 500 hospitals of various size and orientation.
There are a variety of ways CFOs could've tackled their market losses, including reduced salaries or reduced staff per bed, but for the most part that isn't the direction they pursued. The survey shows that FTE salary expenses actually rose by 3%-4% and only a small number of nonclinical contract labor declined. Where did the cost savings come from then?
"[Hospitals] reduced labor expense per discharge by reducing the length of stay; quite simply they put more patients through," Pickens says.
Kudos to all the hospital number-crunchers; your efforts paid off.
Forecast Calls for Snow
Alas, while the CHI findings certainly are very positive news, as I said at the beginning of this column, it's only the first part of the "yard clean up." It's about to snow and there is a slippery sidewalk and driveway you'll have to shovel clear.
I don't like pointing out the unpleasant truth, but the fact remains that many hospitals are still dealing with some seriously bad credit, and let's not forget that healthcare reform, in whatever form, will have a serious impact on the bottom line.
But first, many hospitals have to get their credit back up to snuff. Standard and Poor's July 2009 Ratings Roundup: Criteria-Related Reviews Kept U.S. Public Finance Rating Actions On A Positive Trend In The Second Quarter shows the negative rating trend persisting in Q2 2009 with 22 downgrades and five upgrades.
"Downgrades were slightly more prevalent among higher-rated credits; 56% of these occurred in the medium-to-high investment-grade categories and the remaining 44% were in the low investment-grade or speculative-grade categories," the S&P states. That's not good, at all.
Now you might think that the improvements in total margin that CHI reported would help the credit scores, and they will, but with all that lay ahead for healthcare, hospital CFOs are going to have to work extra hard to get things to tip in their favor. A few of the challenges S&P is concerned about regarding your credit rating:
weaker revenues
declining balance sheets
a difficult economic environment
rising pension contributions
state budget stresses
"We believe that the recession is still taking a toll on the sector," the report says. "Therefore, the negative trends that emerged before the recession have now worsened with operational and non-operational losses increasing, resulting in diminished margins as well as weaker debt service coverage."
The S&P assessment also gives mention to the slower revenue growth, increasing levels of uncompensated care and bad debt, expense pressures (e.g., higher capital-related costs and softer volumes), and last (but by no means least) is Medicaid funding challenges, higher levels of uncompensated care and weaker revenues.
Not doubt about it, the CHI findings are very promising, but CFOs had better be prepared for a lot of financial flurry in 2010. I suggest that if you've managed to get your total margins under control that you get your shovel out now (and remember, bend with your knees and not at the waist, because with all you have on your hands, you can't afford throw your back out).
Note: You can sign up to receive HealthLeaders Media Finance, a free weekly e-newsletter that reports on the top finance issues facing healthcare leaders.
TeamStaff, Inc., a healthcare and administrative staffing services provider, has announced that CEO Rick J. Filippelli will step down, effective Jan. 30, 2010.
Michael G. Perri has been named dean of the University of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions, effective Nov. 6. Perri joined the college's faculty in 1990 and has served as the interim dean since June 2007. A professor in the department of clinical and health psychology, Perri has held several administrative positions in the college, including associate dean for research and head of the health psychology division.
Bruce W. Polsky, MD, who has been serving as interim chairman of the Department of Medicine at St. Luke's and Roosevelt since March 2008, has been named chairman of the Department. Polsky joined St. Luke's-Roosevelt in 1998 as chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases. He was named vice chairman of the department in 2000, and took over the chairmanship on an interim basis in March 2008 with the passing of his predecessor, Michael Lesch, MD. Polsky currently holds the academic title of Professor of Clinical Medicine at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons. Polsky will continue to serve as chief of Infectious Diseases until his successor is named.
UnitedHealth Group has appointed both Christopher J. Walsh and Mitchell Zamoff to the position of executive vice president and general counsel, effective immediately. Zamoff and Walsh have shared the duties on an interim basis for UnitedHealth Group since January 2009. Zamoff will take lead responsibility for regulatory and governmental matters, compliance and litigation. Walsh will be responsible primarily for SEC compliance, mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance, employment and capital markets. They will co-chair the company's legal department.
Oregon Health & Sciences CFO Larry Revill resigned after only two weeks on the job, citing unexpected changes in his personal life. Revill came from the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, TX, where he was vice president of finance/CFO. OHSU's nine-member executive leadership team will meet again soon to decide how to fill his position.
Brazosport Regional has named Chuck Jeffress as its new CFO. Before joining Brazosport Regional, Jeffress was the CFO for Texsan Heart Hospital in San Antonio. In previous positions, Jeffress served as the senior vice president of Managed Care at St. Joseph Health System in Bryan, TX.
Glenn Steele Jr., MD, president/CEO of Geisinger Health System, has been appointed to the board of directors at WellCare Health Plans, Inc. Steele's appointment was made public concurrent with the announcement that Ruben Jose King-Shaw Jr. will resign from the WellCare board at the end of the year. Steele has served in the top jobs at Geisinger Health, headquartered in Danville, PA, since March 2001. In connection with his appointment to the board, Steele received about $150,000 of restricted shares of WellCare's common stock, an SEC filing said. He also will earn fees as a director. WellCare pays all non-employee directors a base annual retainer of $50,000, effective last April, and non-employee directors also receive an additional $2,000 for each meeting of the board that they attend. Members of the committees on which Steele will serve receive an additional annual retainer of $8,000.
With the House's passage of HR 3962 Saturday night, many predictions abounded if healthcare reform was on its way to passage or dead on arrival.
While the compromise bill has yet to emerge from the Senate, here are three areas that will need to be addressed if healthcare reform can move forward in the Senate:
Public insurance option. The public option proposal in the House bill requires the Health and Human Services (HHS) secretary to negotiate rates with healthcare providers as private insurers currently do. The version under consideration in the Senate would permit states to opt out.
Some Democratic senators, such as Mary Landrieau (D-LA) and Joseph Lieberman (I-CT), who usually has voted with the Democrats, have said that they would not support the current proposal. Possibly the suggestion put forth by Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) this summer—"the trigger plan"—could make a reappearance.
The trigger plan would feature nonprofit agencies offering health insurance only in instances in which private insurers could not cover 95% of the people in their regions with plans costing no more than about 15% of the individual's or household's annual income. Snowe has said that her option could be made available in states from "day one in any state" where "affordable, competitive plans" currently do not exist.
Paying for healthcare. In the Senate, the Finance Committee had proposed a tax on higher priced—or "Cadillac" insurance policies. This area remained under intense debate during the current reconciliation process because many unions believed that concern felt by some of their members—who accepted generous insurance packages over wage increases—were being targeted.
The House bill, however, did not look at the higher-priced plans. It instead chose to look at the wealthiest 0.3% of the population, with individuals making more than $500,000 and families making above $1 million would paying a surcharge.
Medicaid expansion. Under the revised House version, individuals and families with incomes now at or below 150% percent of the federal poverty level would be eligible for an expanded Medicaid program. This is higher than the levels currently under consideration in the Senate.
This expansion will initially be fully federally financed, then transitioned to include a 9% contribution from states starting in 2015. The proposed expansion overall has many states, now strapped for funding themselves, worried about how this could impact their bottom lines.